Bandi Sanjay files ₹1 crore defamation suit over POCSO case coverage

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Bandi Sanjay files ₹1 crore defamation suit over POCSO case coverage

Synopsis

Union Minister of State for Home Affairs Bandi Sanjay Kumar has taken 23 defendants — including Google, Meta, X, Telugu news channels, BRS, and Congress — to court over coverage of his son's POCSO arrest, claiming ₹1 crore in damages and citing 50 X posts, 99 Instagram postings, and dozens of YouTube links as evidence of an alleged coordinated smear campaign.

Key Takeaways

Bandi Sanjay Kumar , MoS for Home Affairs, filed a ₹1 crore defamation suit on 25 May 2025 before the City Civil Court, Hyderabad .
The suit names 23 defendants , including Google , Meta , X , Telugu news channels, BRS , and Congress leaders.
The petition cites 50 X posts , 99 Instagram postings , and dozens of YouTube links as alleged defamatory content.
The suit is linked to the POCSO case arrest of his son Bandi Bhageerath .
Sanjay invokes Article 21 of the Constitution, claiming his right to reputation and dignity has been violated.

Minister of State for Home Affairs Bandi Sanjay Kumar on Sunday, 25 May 2025 filed a defamation suit before the vacation bench of the City Civil Court, Hyderabad, claiming ₹1 crore in damages against 23 defendants — including social media platforms, media houses, journalists, and digital accounts — over what he termed a coordinated campaign against him in connection with a POCSO case in which his son Bandi Bhageerath was recently arrested.

What the Suit Alleges

Sanjay contends that the defendants collectively ran a 'sustained and malicious campaign of false, defamatory and misleading publications' across various media and digital platforms, in violation of his Constitutional right to reputation and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. He alleged that the campaign was designed to falsely implicate him personally and politically target his family.

According to the petition, the defendants — spanning media houses, YouTube channels, digital publications, and individual social media accounts — published sensationalised articles, misleading thumbnails, fabricated posts, and speculative commentary to create a false public perception that the minister was personally connected with, influencing, or shielding the alleged acts involving his son.

Scale of the Alleged Campaign

The petition cited 50 posts on X, 99 Instagram postings, and dozens of YouTube links as evidence of the alleged defamatory content. Among the 23 named defendants are tech giants Google, Meta, and X, alongside several Telugu news channels. The petition also names political parties Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) and the Indian National Congress (Congress), their leaders, and individual journalists.

The Minister's Position

Sanjay stated that the defamatory publications remain accessible online and constitute a continuing wrong causing irreparable reputational injury. He argued that owing to his Constitutional office and public stature, the campaign has resulted in grave professional embarrassment, mental agony, humiliation, and political harm. This suit follows an earlier approach to the City Civil Court seeking directions to defendants to remove the allegedly defamatory content.

Background and Context

The defamation action comes in the wake of the arrest of Sanjay's son Bandi Bhageerath under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The case has drawn significant media attention in Telangana, with coverage spanning mainstream Telugu news channels and social media. Notably, this is not the first time a senior political figure has invoked civil defamation proceedings to challenge digital media coverage — a trend that has accelerated in India as social media amplifies political narratives during sensitive legal proceedings. All allegations in the petition are as yet unproven before the court.

Point of View

Blurring the line between a legal remedy and a political counter-offensive. Courts will need to weigh whether the coverage constituted protected commentary on a matter of public concern or crossed into fabrication; until that threshold is tested, the ₹1 crore damages claim functions as much as a deterrent signal as a legal argument.
NationPress
9 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why has Bandi Sanjay Kumar filed a defamation suit?
Bandi Sanjay Kumar filed the suit in response to media and social media coverage of the POCSO case arrest of his son Bandi Bhageerath, alleging that defendants ran a coordinated campaign to falsely portray him as personally involved in or shielding his son's alleged acts. He is seeking ₹1 crore in damages and the removal of the content.
Who are the 23 defendants named in the defamation suit?
The defendants include tech platforms Google, Meta, and X, several Telugu news channels, YouTube channels, digital publications, individual journalists, and political parties BRS and Congress along with their leaders. The petition cites 50 X posts, 99 Instagram postings, and dozens of YouTube links as evidence.
What is the POCSO case that triggered the controversy?
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act case involves the recent arrest of Bandi Bhageerath, the son of MoS Bandi Sanjay Kumar. The details of the case remain sub-judice; all allegations are as yet unproven before the court.
What legal basis has Bandi Sanjay cited for the suit?
Sanjay has invoked Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty — interpreted by courts to include the right to reputation and dignity. He argues the alleged defamatory campaign constitutes a continuing wrong causing irreparable reputational harm.
What relief is the minister seeking from the court?
He is seeking ₹1 crore in damages and directions to the defendants to remove the allegedly defamatory content from their platforms. He had earlier filed a separate application before the City Civil Court, Hyderabad, seeking removal of the content.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 2 months ago
  7. 2 months ago
  8. 2 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google