SIR row: Chhattisgarh CM Vishnu Deo Sai accuses Rahul Gandhi of anti-national conduct

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
SIR row: Chhattisgarh CM Vishnu Deo Sai accuses Rahul Gandhi of anti-national conduct

Synopsis

Chhattisgarh CM Vishnu Deo Sai has demanded an unconditional apology from Rahul Gandhi and Congress over the SIR electoral rolls row, calling their conduct anti-national and a deliberate bid to damage constitutional institutions. Congress has fired back, accusing the ruling side of harbouring a 'phobia of the Gandhi name' — sharpening a political battle that now has the Election Commission squarely at its centre.

Key Takeaways

Chhattisgarh CM Vishnu Deo Sai on 27 September accused Rahul Gandhi and Congress of anti-national conduct over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) electoral rolls row.
Sai cited the Election Commission of India 's joint statement by all three Commissioners as proof of no internal discord, calling Congress claims baseless.
He demanded an unconditional apology from Rahul Gandhi and Congress to the nation and its constitutional institutions.
Congress In-charge and MP Sukhdeo Bhagat hit back, alleging those attacking the Gandhi family never supported India during the freedom struggle and did not accept the Constitution.
Bhagat accused the BJP side of developing a 'phobia of the name Gandhi' when speaking about patriotism.

Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai on Sunday, 27 September, launched a sharp attack on Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi and the Indian National Congress, accusing them of engaging in anti-national conduct in the wake of repeated electoral defeats. The remarks came in response to the Election Commission of India (ECI)'s clarification on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, which has become the latest flashpoint between the ruling dispensation and the Opposition.

Sai's Allegations at Press Conference

Addressing a press conference in Raipur, Chief Minister Sai said it was deeply unfortunate that the Congress, having lost elections more than a hundred times, was now — out of what he described as sheer frustration — discrediting constitutional institutions and tarnishing India's image through what he called 'a politics of constant lies and deception.'

Sai pointed to the joint press conference convened by the Chief Election Commissioner and the other two Election Commissioners, arguing it had categorically demonstrated there was no internal discord within the Commission. He characterised all Congress claims to the contrary as not merely baseless, but as part of a 'deliberate conspiracy' by Gandhi to damage the country's reputation and weaken its constitutional framework.

ECI's Joint Statement at the Centre of the Row

The Election Commission of India's joint press note, Sai said, had clarified the entire situation surrounding the SIR process. He drew a broader pattern, arguing that whenever Congress and its allies face electoral defeat, they resort to false allegations — 'sometimes against EVMs, sometimes against constitutional institutions, and at other times against the Election Commission itself.'

Notably, the SIR controversy has triggered fresh accusations from the Opposition that the electoral roll revision process is being weaponised ahead of upcoming state elections — allegations the Commission has denied. This is the latest in a series of confrontations between Congress and the ECI that have intensified since the 2024 general elections.

Sai Demands Unconditional Apology

Following what he described as the Commission's 'comprehensive and unanimous statement,' Sai demanded that Rahul Gandhi and the Congress offer an unconditional apology to the nation and its constitutional institutions. He stressed that the Election Commission of India enjoys global credibility, and that questioning its impartiality was a clear sign of the Opposition's desperation. The joint statement, he added, had 'once again separated fact from fiction and exposed the Congress's reliance on lies, sensationalism and confusion.'

Congress Hits Back: 'Phobia of the Name Gandhi'

State Congress In-charge and Member of Parliament Sukhdeo Bhagat pushed back sharply. 'I believe that sometimes a right question might get a wrong answer, but if someone asks a wrong question, how can we give a right answer to it?' Bhagat said, responding to Sai's remarks.

Bhagat further alleged that those targeting the Gandhi family had never stood with the nation during the freedom struggle, did not accept the Constitution, and did not hoist the national flag. 'When such people talk about patriotism and target the Gandhi family, it is clear they have developed a phobia of the name 'Gandhi',' he remarked.

The escalating war of words over the SIR process is likely to deepen as state-level political temperatures rise ahead of the next electoral cycle, with both sides now firmly entrenched in conflicting narratives over institutional integrity.

Point of View

Pivot swiftly to patriotism framing. Yet the Congress's counter — questioning whether those in power have their own record of institutional fidelity — signals that this debate will not be resolved by a joint press note alone. What is missing from both sides is a substantive engagement with the SIR process itself: who it affects, how rolls are being revised, and what safeguards exist. As long as the conversation stays at the level of 'anti-national' versus 'Gandhi phobia,' the voters whose names may actually be at stake remain an afterthought.
NationPress
27 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the SIR (Special Intensive Revision) row about?
The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) is a process conducted by the Election Commission of India to update and clean up electoral rolls ahead of elections. The current controversy centres on Congress's allegations that the process is being misused, claims the ECI has denied through a joint statement by all three Commissioners.
What did Chhattisgarh CM Vishnu Deo Sai say about Rahul Gandhi?
CM Sai accused Rahul Gandhi of engaging in anti-national conduct by discrediting constitutional institutions after repeated electoral defeats. He demanded that Gandhi and the Congress offer an unconditional apology to the nation and its constitutional bodies.
How did the Congress respond to Sai's allegations?
State Congress In-charge and MP Sukhdeo Bhagat rejected the charges, alleging that those targeting the Gandhi family had not supported India during the freedom struggle and did not accept the Constitution. He said critics of the Gandhi family had developed a 'phobia of the name Gandhi.'
What was the Election Commission's role in this controversy?
The Election Commission of India issued a joint press note and held a press conference with all three Commissioners to clarify the SIR process and deny any internal discord within the Commission, which became the focal point of CM Sai's defence of the institution.
Why does this political row matter beyond Chhattisgarh?
The dispute reflects a recurring national pattern where electoral losses trigger Opposition allegations against the ECI, followed by ruling-party counter-charges of institutional sabotage. With state elections on the horizon, the intensity of this exchange signals how central institutional credibility will be to the next electoral cycle.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 4 hours ago
  2. 4 hours ago
  3. 4 hours ago
  4. 4 hours ago
  5. 4 hours ago
  6. Yesterday
  7. 4 days ago
  8. 4 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google