Gujarat ACB traps 4 in two bribery cases, including cop and advocate

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Gujarat ACB traps 4 in two bribery cases, including cop and advocate

Synopsis

In two separate ACB sting operations across Gujarat, four accused — a police ASI, an advocate, and two contractual welfare inspectors — were caught allegedly accepting bribes totalling ₹2.54 lakh. One trap targeted a demand to quash a police case; the other exposed extortion of a housing scheme beneficiary. Both stings were triggered by complainants who chose the ACB's 1064 helpline over paying up.

Key Takeaways

Gujarat ACB conducted two separate sting operations on 4 October 2025 , arresting four individuals.
Narendrasinh Chavda (ASI, Mahudha Police Station) and advocate Justice Kalidas Rohit allegedly demanded ₹2.5 lakh to settle a dispute and avoid a case registration.
Rohit was caught accepting ₹2.5 lakh at a trap location in Mahudha Chokdi ; Chavda was not present but is accused of acting in connivance.
In Bhuj , contractual Social Welfare Inspectors Asif Mustafa Qureshi and Kanji Bhatti were caught accepting ₹4,000 to process housing scheme instalments.
All four are booked under the Prevention of Corruption Act ; investigations are ongoing.
Both complaints were filed through the ACB's toll-free helpline 1064 .

Four individuals — a police Assistant Sub-Inspector (ASI), an advocate, and two contractual Social Welfare Inspectors — were arrested by the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) of Gujarat on Saturday, 4 October 2025, in two separate sting operations across the state. The accused allegedly accepted bribes totalling ₹2.54 lakh, according to ACB officials.

The Mahudha Case: Cop and Advocate Booked

In the first trap, Narendrasinh Chavda, an ASI posted at Mahudha Police Station in Kheda district, and Justice Kalidas Rohit, 30, an advocate from Nadiad native to Mahisa village in Mahudha taluka, were booked for allegedly demanding a bribe of ₹2.5 lakh to settle a dispute and prevent registration of a formal case.

According to ACB officials, the complainant and his son are engaged in the business of detergent powder and allied products. On 1 October, the complainant's son and his business partner were allegedly brought to Mahudha Police Station along with their goods vehicle after Rohit accused them of cheating local traders.

When the complainant visited the station on 2 October, Chavda allegedly demanded ₹5 lakh in Rohit's presence to reach a settlement. After negotiations, the amount was reportedly reduced to ₹2.5 lakh. Unwilling to pay, the complainant contacted the ACB through its toll-free helpline 1064.

Acting on the complaint, the ACB laid a trap at Office No. 24, Shyam Arcade, opposite a Nayara petrol pump at Mahudha Chokdi. Rohit allegedly demanded and accepted the ₹2.5 lakh at the location and was caught by ACB officers. Chavda was reportedly not present at the spot at the time of the trap, though the ACB alleged the two acted in connivance and assisted each other in the offence.

The Bhuj Case: Two Welfare Inspectors Nabbed

In a separate operation in Bhuj, two contractual Social Welfare Inspectors were caught allegedly accepting a bribe of ₹4,000 to process housing assistance instalments due to a beneficiary under the Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Housing Scheme.

The accused were identified as Asif Mustafa Qureshi, 28, and Kanji Bhatti, 32. Both are employed on a contractual basis at the Office of the Social Welfare Officer (Developed Castes), Bhuj-Kutch, handling schemes and scholarships.

The ACB said the two officials allegedly demanded ₹4,000 from the complainant for depositing different instalments of financial assistance sanctioned for his house. The complainant refused to pay and approached the Bhuj ACB. After registering his complaint, the agency arranged a trap at Bahumali Bhavan, where both accused asked the complainant to hand over the bribe and subsequently accepted it — and were immediately detained.

Pattern and Context

The two operations underscore a recurring pattern of petty corruption in government-administered welfare disbursements and police dispute resolution in Gujarat. The Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Housing Scheme is aimed at economically weaker sections, making the alleged extortion of beneficiaries particularly significant. Notably, both operations were triggered by complainants who independently contacted the ACB rather than yielding to alleged demands — an indicator that awareness of the ACB's toll-free channel is growing among citizens.

What Happens Next

Cases have been registered against all four accused under the relevant provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The ACB has alleged connivance in both sets of arrests. Further investigation is underway to determine whether the accused had extorted money from other complainants in similar fashion previously.

Point of View

But the cases also raise questions about systemic oversight — why do contractual welfare inspectors have unilateral control over disbursement timelines? Without structural reform to how welfare instalments are processed, each successful ACB trap risks being an exception rather than a deterrent.
NationPress
4 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Who were the four people arrested by Gujarat ACB in the October 2025 bribery cases?
The four accused are ASI Narendrasinh Chavda (Mahudha Police Station), advocate Justice Kalidas Rohit (Nadiad), and contractual Social Welfare Inspectors Asif Mustafa Qureshi and Kanji Bhatti (Bhuj-Kutch). They were caught in two separate ACB sting operations on 4 October 2025.
What bribe was demanded in the Mahudha police station case?
ASI Narendrasinh Chavda and advocate Justice Kalidas Rohit allegedly demanded ₹5 lakh initially, later reduced to ₹2.5 lakh, to settle a dispute involving a detergent trader and his son and to avoid registration of a criminal case. The ACB trapped and caught Rohit accepting the ₹2.5 lakh.
What is the Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Housing Scheme and why is it relevant?
The Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Housing Scheme provides financial assistance for house construction to eligible beneficiaries in Gujarat. Two contractual Social Welfare Inspectors were caught allegedly demanding ₹4,000 from a scheme beneficiary to process his due housing assistance instalments.
How were the ACB traps set up?
In both cases, the complainants refused to pay the alleged bribes and contacted the Gujarat ACB through its toll-free helpline 1064. The ACB registered their complaints and arranged sting operations — in Mahudha Chokdi and Bahumali Bhavan in Bhuj respectively — where the accused were caught in the act.
What legal action has been taken against the accused?
All four accused have been booked under provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The ACB has alleged that each pair of accused acted in connivance, and further investigation is underway to determine the full extent of their alleged corrupt activities.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 week ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 3 months ago
  7. 3 months ago
  8. 5 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google