Fringe elements won't thrive under my watch, says Karnataka Home Minister Priyank Kharge after HC raps Whitefield police

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Fringe elements won't thrive under my watch, says Karnataka Home Minister Priyank Kharge after HC raps Whitefield police

Synopsis

Karnataka Home Minister Priyank Kharge's blunt warning — 'They will not thrive. Don't worry' — came after the Karnataka High Court publicly shamed Whitefield Police for allegedly dragging a Hindu activist from Udupi over a social media post, and sarcastically suggested renaming the station 'Darkfield Police Station.' The case has exposed a fault line between organised pressure groups, police overreach, and judicial oversight in Karnataka.

Key Takeaways

Karnataka Home Minister Priyank Kharge warned on Monday that 'fringe elements' misusing hurt-sentiment claims to disrupt lawful events will not be tolerated.
Karnataka High Court sharply rebuked Whitefield Police, Bengaluru for allegedly arresting Hindu Janajagruti Samiti convenor Mohan Gowda from Udupi despite a notice requiring him to appear only after three days.
Nagaprasanna questioned who authorised the arrest, flagged missing CCTV footage, and sarcastically suggested renaming the station 'Darkfield Police Station.' The court warned of a possible departmental inquiry and adverse service record entries against the officers involved.
Gowda was reportedly detained for sharing a post celebrating the cancellation of comedian Kunal Kamra 's show in Bengaluru.

Karnataka Home Minister Priyank Kharge on Monday issued a stern warning that 'fringe elements' exploiting the law through social media complaints or claims of hurt religious sentiments will not be tolerated, asserting that unlawful, unscientific, or illogical actions will be dealt with firmly. His remarks follow the Karnataka High Court's sharp rebuke of Bengaluru's Whitefield Police over repeated instances of alleged illegal arrests.

What Kharge Said

Speaking to reporters, Kharge drew a clear line between protecting lawful activities and cracking down on groups that attempt to disrupt them under the guise of hurt sentiments. 'As long as whoever is the entertainer or whoever is the institution that is doing this is well within the law, they will be allowed to function freely in the state of Karnataka,' he said.

He was equally direct about those on the other side: 'These fringe elements who think they can get away by posting things on social media and by claiming to have their feelings hurt — if it is illegal, unscientific or illogical, then it will not be tolerated.' Responding to concerns about such groups gaining ground, Kharge said bluntly, 'I am the Home Minister. They will not thrive. Don't worry.'

The Mohan Gowda Arrest That Triggered the Controversy

The backdrop to Kharge's statement is the case of Mohan Gowda, convenor of the Hindu Janajagruti Samiti, who was detained by Whitefield Police reportedly for sharing a post celebrating the cancellation of Indian comedian Kunal Kamra's show in Bengaluru. Gowda had been served a notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS to appear before police after three days — yet officers reportedly travelled to Udupi to bring him in, a move the court found difficult to justify.

Kharge also referenced an event that was shifted to another venue after objections were raised, but said the disruption itself was unacceptable: 'The show went on in another venue, but these fringe elements are raising the red flags. That will not be tolerated.'

Karnataka High Court's Scathing Observations

Justice M. Nagaprasanna of the Karnataka High Court questioned the police's conduct in pointed terms on Saturday. 'A constable registers a complaint. All of you travel to Udupi to get the person, the so-called accused, for what? For what, sir? Who is giving you instructions?' the judge asked.

The court also took exception to the handling of CCTV footage, with Whitefield Police citing power fluctuations as the reason for missing footage. Justice Nagaprasanna responded sarcastically, suggesting the station be renamed 'Darkfield Police Station.' He warned that a departmental inquiry could be ordered and that adverse entries could be made in the concerned officer's service record.

'You cannot take the liberty of citizens for granted just because you are in a uniform,' Justice Nagaprasanna said. He added: 'You may escape anybody's eyes, but when it comes to the eyes of the court, you cannot escape.' The bench also remarked that the police action could have been driven by 'someone's ego' and observed, 'This has become — the police themselves have to be policed now. What a state!'

Broader Implications for Law and Order in Karnataka

The episode has placed the Karnataka government under a dual spotlight: scrutiny over police overreach on one hand, and the Home Minister's response to organised pressure groups on the other. The government has maintained that lawful activities will be protected while violations will be handled through due process.

This comes amid a wider national debate over the use of hurt-sentiment complaints as a tool to suppress performances, comedy shows, and public events — a pattern critics argue has been increasingly weaponised. Whether Kharge's warning translates into systemic reform of policing practices in Bengaluru remains to be seen.

Point of View

But the harder question is institutional: how did Whitefield Police end up travelling to Udupi to detain someone served a three-day notice, and who gave the order? The High Court's question — 'Who is giving you instructions?' — is one the government has not yet answered publicly. If the Karnataka administration is serious about reining in both fringe groups and police overreach, it needs to answer the court's question, not just issue press-facing assurances. The 'Darkfield Police Station' remark is a judicial rebuke that should embarrass the government into structural accountability, not just rhetorical firmness.
NationPress
31 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the Karnataka High Court rebuke Whitefield Police?
The Karnataka High Court rebuked Whitefield Police for allegedly detaining Hindu Janajagruti Samiti convenor Mohan Gowda from Udupi, even though he had been served a notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS to appear before police only after three days. Justice M. Nagaprasanna questioned who authorised the move and flagged missing CCTV footage, sarcastically suggesting the station be renamed 'Darkfield Police Station.'
What did Karnataka Home Minister Priyank Kharge say about fringe elements?
Kharge said that groups using social media complaints or claims of hurt religious sentiments to disrupt lawful activities will not be tolerated. He stated, 'These fringe elements who think they can get away by posting things on social media and by claiming to have their feelings hurt — if it is illegal, unscientific or illogical, then it will not be tolerated,' adding, 'I am the Home Minister. They will not thrive.'
Who is Mohan Gowda and why was he detained?
Mohan Gowda is the convenor of the Hindu Janajagruti Samiti. He was reportedly detained by Whitefield Police in Bengaluru for sharing a social media post celebrating the cancellation of comedian Kunal Kamra's show in the city.
What consequences did the Karnataka High Court warn of for the police officers?
Justice M. Nagaprasanna warned that a departmental inquiry could be ordered and that adverse entries could be made in the service records of the officers involved. The court also stated that police cannot take 'the liberty of citizens for granted just because you are in a uniform.'
What is the broader issue this case highlights?
The case highlights a growing pattern of hurt-sentiment complaints being used to pressure police into acting against performers, comedians, and public events. It also raises questions about police accountability and chain of command, with the High Court directly asking who instructed officers to travel to Udupi for an arrest that may not have been legally warranted.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 3 days ago
  2. 3 weeks ago
  3. 3 weeks ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 10 months ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google