NHRC issues notices over minor's alleged injury at 'Chalo Sansad' protest in Delhi

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
NHRC issues notices over minor's alleged injury at 'Chalo Sansad' protest in Delhi

Synopsis

The NHRC has stepped in after a complaint alleged a 12-year-old girl was injured during the 'Chalo Sansad' protest in Delhi — directing three authorities to act within two weeks, while Delhi Police has publicly denied the injury claims as false. The case now sits at the intersection of child rights, protest safety, and a contested social media narrative.

Key Takeaways

The NHRC has taken cognisance of a complaint alleging a 12-year-old girl sustained a head injury during the 'Chalo Sansad' protest in New Delhi .
Notices issued to Delhi government's Social Welfare department , MeitY , and the Delhi Commissioner of Police to submit an ATR within two weeks .
Action initiated under Section 12 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 by a Bench led by NHRC Member Priyank Kanoongo .
The complaint also sought legal action against journalist Sourav Das and social media platform X if information shared is found to be false.
Delhi Police has publicly denied the injury claims, calling them 'false' in a fact-check post on X.

The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has taken cognisance of a complaint alleging that minor children were endangered during the 'Chalo Sansad' protest in New Delhi, with the complaint specifically claiming that a 12-year-old girl sustained a head injury during the demonstration. The commission has directed three authorities to submit an Action Taken Report (ATR) within two weeks.

Notices Issued to Three Authorities

A Bench presided over by NHRC Member Priyank Kanoongo has issued notices to the Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Women and Child Development, Delhi government; the Secretary, Union Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY); and the Delhi Commissioner of Police. All three have been directed to inquire into the allegations and file their responses within the stipulated two-week period.

The action has been initiated under Section 12 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, which empowers the apex human rights body to probe alleged violations of human rights.

What the Complaint Alleged

According to the complaint, minor children were exposed to danger during the protest held on Monday, with a 12-year-old girl reportedly suffering a head injury. The complainant sought the NHRC's intervention on multiple fronts: immediate rescue and medical treatment for the child, her production before the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) as mandated by law, identification of the adult who brought the child to the protest site, and appropriate action under the Juvenile Justice Act.

The complaint further sought action if any authority was found to have manhandled the child. Notably, it also alleged that information circulated on social media platform X by journalist Sourav Das may have been false or misleading, urging the NHRC to direct legal action — including an FIR — against him and the platform if the allegations were substantiated.

NHRC's Directions to Authorities

After examining the complaint, the NHRC observed that the allegations, prima facie, appear to involve violations of the child's human rights. The commission directed concerned authorities to immediately rescue the child, ensure necessary medical treatment, and produce her before the Child Welfare Committee as required under law.

It further directed authorities to identify the person who brought the child to the protest and initiate proceedings under the Juvenile Justice Act. The NHRC also ordered that if any authority is found to have manhandled the child, appropriate proceedings be initiated against them.

On the social media angle, the commission directed that if the information circulated on X by Sourav Das is found to be false or misleading, immediate legal action — including registration of an FIR — be taken against him and the platform, with a detailed ATR submitted within two weeks.

Delhi Police Contests the Claims

Amid the controversy, Delhi Police issued a clarification on social media, describing as 'false' the claims circulating online that a 12-year-old girl suffered a head injury and that 40 to 50 other people sustained head injuries during the protest.

'This information is false. The claims being circulated in the posts are not true. Please do not spread or amplify false or misleading information,' Delhi Police said in a fact-check post on X.

What Happens Next

With the NHRC's two-week deadline now running, the Delhi government's social welfare department, MeitY, and Delhi Police are each required to submit independent action taken reports. Depending on the findings, the commission could escalate proceedings or direct further remedial action — including legal steps against individuals or platforms found to have spread misinformation about the protest.

Point of View

Issued on the same platform where the allegations spread, underscores how X has become both the arena for contested claims and the tool for official rebuttals. The inclusion of MeitY in the notice list — alongside police and social welfare — signals that the NHRC is treating the alleged spread of misinformation as seriously as the physical safety question. Whether the ATR process produces accountability or bureaucratic deflection will be the real test of this intervention.
NationPress
21 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why has the NHRC issued notices over the 'Chalo Sansad' protest?
The NHRC took cognisance of a complaint alleging that minor children, including a 12-year-old girl who reportedly sustained a head injury, were endangered during the 'Chalo Sansad' protest in New Delhi. The commission found the allegations prima facie indicative of child rights violations and directed three authorities to submit action taken reports within two weeks.
Who has been served notices by the NHRC?
The NHRC has issued notices to the Secretary of Delhi government's Department of Social Welfare, Women and Child Development; the Secretary of the Union Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY); and the Delhi Commissioner of Police.
What action has Delhi Police taken regarding the injury claims?
Delhi Police has publicly denied the claims, posting a fact-check on X stating that reports of a 12-year-old girl sustaining a head injury — and that 40 to 50 others were also hurt — are 'false'. The force urged the public not to spread or amplify the information.
What is the complaint asking for beyond medical relief for the child?
Beyond immediate medical treatment and production of the child before the Child Welfare Committee, the complaint sought identification of the adult who brought the minor to the protest, action under the Juvenile Justice Act, and — if found false or misleading — legal action including an FIR against journalist Sourav Das and social media platform X.
Under which law has the NHRC acted?
The NHRC has initiated action under Section 12 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, which empowers the commission to inquire into alleged violations of human rights.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 week ago
  2. 3 weeks ago
  3. 4 months ago
  4. 5 months ago
  5. 7 months ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google