Tejasvi Surya: Karnataka govt attacked 3 laws protecting Bengaluru parks, lakes

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Tejasvi Surya: Karnataka govt attacked 3 laws protecting Bengaluru parks, lakes

Synopsis

BJP MP Tejasvi Surya has accused the Karnataka government of gutting three laws — on parks, lakes, and urban transport planning — to push tunnel road projects through Bengaluru's green and water bodies. With Bengaluru's lake count reportedly down from 1,000 to under 200, the row cuts to the heart of the city's water security and long-term liveability.

Key Takeaways

BJP MP Tejasvi Surya alleged on 4 September that the Karnataka government amended three laws — the Parks Act , Tank Conservation Act , and BMLTA Act — to enable tunnel road projects.
The Parks Act amendment reportedly permits diversion and sale of up to 5% of park land, affecting Sankey Tank , Lalbagh , and Krishna Rao Park .
The Tank Conservation Act amendment allegedly slashed the mandatory lake buffer zone from 30 metres to 3 metres near Hebbal Lake , requiring 3.5 acres of lake land for the short tunnel project.
Bengaluru's lake count has reportedly fallen from over 1,000 to fewer than 200 due to encroachments, raising water security concerns.
The BMLTA Act was passed after 18 years of citizen activism; Surya demanded its restoration along with the withdrawal of other amendments.
The Karnataka government has reportedly promised a review of the Parks Act amendment following public outcry.

Bengaluru South Member of Parliament Tejasvi Surya of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Friday, 4 September alleged that the Karnataka government had systematically undermined three critical laws safeguarding Bengaluru's parks, lakes, and coordinated urban planning — all, he claimed, to clear the path for proposed tunnel road projects across the city.

Three Laws Under Fire

Addressing reporters, Surya identified the three targeted legislations: the Parks Act, the Karnataka Tank Conservation Act, and the Bengaluru Metropolitan Land Transport Authority (BMLTA) Act. 'The Parks Act protected the parks, the Tank Act protected the lakes, and the BMLTA Act ensured scientific, coordinated urban planning. The state government has attacked all three Acts,' he said.

According to Surya, amendments to the Parks Act were introduced to enable the acquisition of green spaces at Sankey Tank, Lalbagh, and Krishna Rao Park for the proposed long tunnel project. The amendment reportedly makes the diversion and sale of up to five per cent of park land legally permissible — a change that triggered a significant public backlash.

Lake Buffer Zones Slashed

Surya alleged that the Karnataka Tank Conservation Act was amended to facilitate a short tunnel project near Hebbal Lake, for which 3.5 acres of lake land is reportedly required. He claimed the amendment reduced the mandatory lake buffer zone from 30 metres to just 3 metres, calling the change 'as good as having no buffer zone at all.'

The MP warned that the erosion of lake land carries consequences far beyond ecology. Bengaluru, once celebrated as the 'city of lakes' with over 1,000 lakes, now has fewer than 200, according to Surya — a decline he attributed to decades of encroachment. 'Most of Bengaluru's drinking water needs are met through borewells, which are dependent on the underground water and aquifers of the city. So if you kill the lakes, you are literally killing the underground water sources and aquifers of the city,' he said.

BMLTA Amendment and Urban Planning Concerns

On the BMLTA Act, Surya said Section 19 of the legislation required the state government to submit all infrastructure proposals to the authority for scientific scrutiny and inter-agency coordination. He alleged the government amended the Act specifically because the BMLTA had become a legal obstacle to pushing through the tunnel road project without adequate review.

'The BMLTA Act was passed by the Bommai government after 18 years of continuous citizen activism in the city. Now, that also needs to be restored,' Surya said. He demanded the full withdrawal of amendments to both the Tank Conservation Act and the BMLTA Act.

Government's Response and BJP's Campaign

Following a large public outcry, the Karnataka government reportedly promised to review the Parks Act amendment. Surya, however, expressed scepticism. 'We don't know what this review will mean. We will be watching it and will ensure that it is reviewed and taken back to the same position as it was earlier,' he said.

Surya framed the BJP's campaign as a broader civic movement — not merely opposition politics — aimed at protecting Bengaluru's 'lung spaces,' long-term water security, and the integrity of its urban planning framework. He thanked residents for their vocal opposition and vowed to sustain the campaign until the amendments are reversed. 'We will continue building this civic momentum until the state withdraws the draconian amendments made to the Lake Act and also to the BMLTA Act,' he said.

The controversy comes amid growing concerns over Bengaluru's infrastructure expansion and its impact on the city's already stressed ecological systems.

Point of View

Not a legal commitment. Until the amendments are formally reversed, the civic campaign Surya is championing has a concrete, measurable demand — which is more than most opposition movements can claim.
NationPress
4 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Which three laws did Tejasvi Surya allege were amended by the Karnataka government?
Surya alleged that the Karnataka government amended the Parks Act, the Karnataka Tank Conservation Act, and the Bengaluru Metropolitan Land Transport Authority (BMLTA) Act. He claimed all three amendments were introduced to facilitate proposed short and long tunnel road projects in Bengaluru.
How does the Parks Act amendment affect Bengaluru's green spaces?
According to Surya, the amendment makes it legally permissible to divert and sell up to 5% of park land. This reportedly enables the acquisition of land at Sankey Tank, Lalbagh, and Krishna Rao Park for the proposed long tunnel project.
What change was made to the lake buffer zone under the Tank Conservation Act amendment?
Surya alleged the mandatory lake buffer zone was reduced from 30 metres to just 3 metres, specifically near Hebbal Lake, where 3.5 acres of lake land is required for the short tunnel project. He described the reduced buffer as 'as good as having no buffer zone at all.'
Why does Surya say the destruction of Bengaluru's lakes threatens the city's water supply?
Surya argued that most of Bengaluru's drinking water is sourced from borewells that depend on underground aquifers, which in turn are recharged by the city's lakes. With Bengaluru's lake count reportedly falling from over 1,000 to fewer than 200, he warned that further lake loss would directly undermine the city's groundwater reserves and long-term water security.
What is the BMLTA Act and why is its amendment controversial?
The BMLTA Act governs coordinated urban transport planning in Bengaluru. Section 19 required the state government to submit infrastructure proposals to the authority for scientific review and inter-agency coordination. Surya alleged the amendment was introduced specifically to bypass this oversight mechanism for the tunnel project. He noted the Act was originally passed after 18 years of citizen activism under the Bommai government.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 months ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 10 months ago
  4. 10 months ago
  5. 10 months ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google