What is the Full List of ‘Tainted’ Teachers Released by WBSSC for the 2016 Panel?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The West Bengal School Service Commission has released a full list of teachers from the 2016 panel proven guilty of obtaining teaching positions through corruption. This significant action follows court orders aimed at ensuring transparency and integrity in the recruitment process. Learn more about the implications of this decision and the ongoing recruitment efforts.
Key Takeaways
- WBSSC has released a list of “tainted” teachers from the 2016 panel.
- The release follows mandates from the Calcutta High Court and Supreme Court.
- These teachers are prohibited from future recruitment.
- A new recruitment process is to be completed by December 31.
- Some teachers improperly participated in recent exams, leading to legal challenges.
Kolkata, Nov 27 (NationPress) The West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) has unveiled a comprehensive list of “tainted” teachers from its 2016 panel, confirming their involvement in securing teaching positions in government-run schools through monetary transactions.
This list was made public on the WBSSC's official website on Thursday afternoon, following directives from both the Calcutta High Court and the Supreme Court.
The courts mandated the WBSSC to disclose this list to prevent any future recruitment opportunities for these “tainted” teachers.
It’s important to note that on April 3 of this year, the Supreme Court upheld a prior decision by a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court to annul the entire WBSSC panel from 2016.
The apex court recognized the High Court’s position that the complete panel needed cancellation due to the failure of the state education department and the commission to provide two distinct lists separating “untainted” candidates from “tainted” ones, despite persistent requests.
The Supreme Court stipulated that a new recruitment process must be finalized by December 31 of this year.
While the “tainted” teachers are barred from participating in the new recruitment, “untainted” teachers can still take part.
In September, the WBSSC held written examinations separately for the fresh recruitment of secondary and higher secondary teachers to fill vacancies that arose from the apex court's ruling.
However, after the results of the higher secondary examination were released, a petition was lodged at the Calcutta High Court contesting the results. The petitioner alleged that some tainted teachers from the 2016 panel were improperly permitted to take part in the written examination, contravening the apex court's order, and some even qualified for interviews.
Earlier this month, the Calcutta High Court mandated the WBSSC to publish the complete list of tainted teachers from the 2016 recruitment panel. This issue escalated to the Supreme Court, which upheld the High Court's directive.
Point of View
The release of the WBSSC list is a significant step towards restoring trust in the educational recruitment process. It highlights the judiciary's role in ensuring accountability and integrity in public service, a matter of national interest that resonates with citizens across the country.
NationPress
27/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What led to the publication of the tainted teachers' list?
The publication was directed by the Calcutta High Court and the Supreme Court to prevent any future recruitment of teachers proven guilty of corruption.
What are the implications for the tainted teachers?
The tainted teachers are barred from participating in any future recruitment processes for state-run schools.
When must the new recruitment process be completed?
The Supreme Court has mandated that the entire fresh recruitment process be finalized by December 31 of this year.
What happened in the recent recruitment exams?
WBSSC conducted written examinations for new secondary and higher secondary teacher positions, but some tainted teachers attempted to participate in violation of court orders.
What is the role of the judiciary in this matter?
The judiciary has played a crucial role in ensuring transparency and accountability in educational recruitment, emphasizing the need for integrity in public service.
