Did the Bombay HC's Decision on Anil Ambani's Loan Account as Fraud Come as a Setback?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- The Bombay High Court upheld SBI's fraud classification against Anil Ambani.
- SBI's decision followed RBI guidelines.
- Allegations against Ambani included fund diversion and covenant breaches.
- The loan classification could have major implications for Reliance Communications.
- RCom is currently under the control of a resolution professional.
Mumbai, Oct 3 (NationPress) In a significant blow to industrialist Anil Ambani, the Bombay High Court on Friday upheld SBI’s decision to label his loan account as “fraud”.
A panel of Justices Revati Mohite Dere and Neela Gokhale denied Ambani’s claims of procedural injustice, affirming the bank’s actions.
The court dismissed the industrialist’s accusations of the bank's arbitrary behavior, noting that SBI complied with the RBI's July 2024 Master Directions concerning fraud classifications.
In June 2025, the bank categorized the loan accounts of Reliance Communications (RCom) and its founder, Anil Ambani, as fraudulent.
SBI pointed to instances of fund diversion, violations of covenants, and related-party transactions as justification for its decision, subsequently notifying the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for further action.
Anil Ambani contested this decision, arguing that he was merely a non-executive director and claimed he was unfairly targeted. He also asserted that the bank did not afford him a sufficient opportunity to defend himself.
Earlier this month, Bank of Baroda announced in an exchange filing that the loan accounts of Reliance Communications Ltd and its former director Anil Ambani had been classified as “fraud”.
This classification is related to loans acquired before RCom entered the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP), according to the exchange filing.
This incident represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing financial turmoil surrounding the formerly prominent telecom enterprise and its previous director.
RCom, which underwent CIRP under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, indicated that the disputed loans are associated with the timeframe prior to its insolvency procedures commencing. The company contended that these loans should be addressed as part of a resolution plan or through liquidation per the IBC.
Currently, RCom is under the management of a resolution professional, Anish Niranjan Nanavaty. Anil Ambani is no longer associated as a director.