Is the Jane Street Saga Exposing F&O Trading as a Playground for Big Players?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Rahul Gandhi criticizes the F&O market as a haven for big players.
- Jane Street has been banned for manipulative trading practices.
- SEBI admits to significant manipulations affecting retail investors.
- Unregulated F&O trading has surged 45 times over five years.
- 90% of small investors reportedly lost substantial amounts.
New Delhi, July 7 (NationPress) The Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, expressed on Monday that the futures and options (F&O) trading arena has transformed into a playground dominated by 'big players', highlighting that the Jane Street saga illustrates how retail investors are suffering the most.
Jane Street has been prohibited by the capital markets regulator SEBI from participating in the Indian stock market due to alleged manipulative trading practices that reportedly allowed the firm to reap unlawful profits amounting to thousands of crores.
In a post shared on the social media platform X, Gandhi mentioned that he had previously stated in 2024 that "the F&O market has become a playground for 'big players,' with small investors continuously losing their hard-earned money".
"Now SEBI itself acknowledges that Jane Street manipulated thousands of crores. Why did SEBI remain silent for so long? At whose directive was the Modi government turning a blind eye?" questioned the Congress leader.
Reposting his previous entry from September 24, 2024, he further queried, "And how many more large sharks are still preying on retail investors?"
In light of SEBI's claims regarding Jane Street's profits exceeding ₹43,000 crore in index options through dubious strategies, Gandhi shared a follow-up post on X concerning SEBI.
In his earlier X post, he highlighted that unregulated F&O trading has surged 45 times over the past five years, asserting that 90 percent of small investors lost ₹1.8 lakh within the last three years.
Earlier in the day, SEBI Chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey stated that the regulator possesses the authority to act against manipulative trading practices in relation to the New York-based trading giant Jane Street Group, as evidenced by the interim order to bar the global entity from the Indian stock market.
Pandey emphasized that the focus should be on enforcement and monitoring instead of imposing additional regulations, stating that "the order in the Jane Street case speaks for itself".
"We acted within the existing regulations. Therefore, maintaining the same regulations, it’s enforcement and monitoring that can genuinely make a difference. Excessive regulations do not equate to effective oversight; these are two distinct concepts," Pandey remarked.
He noted that significant analytical efforts were dedicated to the Jane Street case, as manipulative tactics can be executed in various ways.
Jane Street engaged in aggressive trading within the derivatives (futures) segment, where the firm conducted trades to unfairly influence market prices for quick profits.