Ujjivan's Universal Banking License Application Rejected by RBI
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Mumbai, April 13 (NationPress) The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has declined the universal banking license application submitted by Ujjivan Small Finance Bank (SFB) due to insufficient diversification in its asset portfolio, as indicated in a recent exchange filing.
According to the notice, "The RBI acknowledged the Bank's recent initiatives aimed at diversifying its loan offerings. However, they believe there is room for improvement in this domain. Consequently, the RBI has returned the aforementioned application and recommended that the Bank consider reapplying after proving a more diversified loan portfolio."
This marks the second time in recent weeks that the RBI has rejected a small finance bank's application for a universal banking license. Previously, Jana SFB's application was also returned, while AU SFB received in-principle approval to transition into a universal bank. Additionally, Fino Payments Bank was granted in-principle approval to change its status to an SFB.
As of Q3FY26, Ujjivan SFB reported a gross loan book of Rs. 37,057 crore, with group loans constituting 45% of this total.
The Reserve Bank encourages small finance banks to broaden their loan portfolios to mitigate heavy dependence on high-risk, uncollateralized microfinance, which often leads to elevated non-performing assets (NPAs) during economic downturns. By easing priority sector lending requirements and promoting diversification into retail, vehicle, and SME loans, the RBI aims to enhance asset quality, stabilize earnings, and prepare SFBs for a transition to resilient universal banks.
Many small finance banks currently maintain a significant exposure to microfinance. Transitioning towards secured loans such as those for cars, two-wheelers, and housing finance helps diminish asset quality risks, particularly in stressed microfinance environments.
Diversification serves as a safeguard against rising Gross Non-Performing Assets (GNPAs) that can emerge from sector-specific challenges. This shift acts as a protective measure, evident when SFBs pivoted from high-risk, unsecured lending towards more secure segments.