Will a Government Supported by Islamists Ever Grasp India's Relationship?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Former Bangladesh Minister Mohammad Ali Arafat criticizes the interim government backed by Islamists, arguing it lacks an understanding of the crucial relationship between Bangladesh and India. This statement follows significant legal actions against former leaders and highlights the importance of historical context in diplomatic relations.
Key Takeaways
- Mohammad Ali Arafat criticizes the current interim government.
- The ICT issued a death sentence to former Prime Minister Hasina.
- Bangladesh's relationship with India is rooted in shared historical and mutual interests.
- Successful diplomatic resolutions can lead to long-term benefits for both nations.
- Influences from the Pakistani military can hinder regional cooperation.
Dhaka, Nov 18 (NationPress) Former Bangladesh Minister and Awami League figure Mohammad Ali Arafat criticized the interim government led by Muhammad Yunus on Tuesday, declaring that a regime supported by Islamist extremists will never grasp the true nature of the party's ties with India.
This statement followed the Bangladesh International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) issuing a death sentence for the former Prime Minister, who was found guilty of "crimes against humanity" linked to protests from July of the previous year.
The ICT also convicted two of Hasina's senior aides, sentencing former Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal to death and former Inspector General of Police Chowdhury Abdullah Al-Mamun, who became a state witness, to five years in prison.
On Monday, Dhaka urged New Delhi to promptly hand over Hasina and Kamal, claiming this action is a treaty-bound obligation for India.
In a statement on X, Arafat remarked, “Our relationship with India is rooted not just in 1971 but also in our shared interests across various domains, including collaboratively tackling domestic and transnational terrorism. Under Sheikh Hasina's leadership, the government not only signed the Land Boundary Agreement with India but also amicably resolved the maritime boundary dispute through constructive dialogue.”
“Many neighboring nations have engaged in prolonged conflicts over such issues, whereas Bangladesh and India successfully settled them amicably. Our collaboration in communication and energy sectors has significantly benefitted people on both sides,” he continued.
Arafat emphasized that the Awami League perceives relations with India through the lens of the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War, not through the perspective of the Pakistani military.
“Diplomacy founded on cooperation and collaboration through the 1971 perspective will consistently aid in resolving issues and enhancing the welfare of people on both sides, as evidenced positively during Sheikh Hasina's tenure. Conversely, diplomacy with India influenced by the dictates of the Pakistani military will result only in mutual detriment, with the populace ultimately suffering the most. I would also mention the concept of Game Theory for those who fail to comprehend this diplomatic approach under Sheikh Hasina,” he added.
Point of View
It is essential to acknowledge the significance of diplomatic relationships shaped by historical context. The Awami League's approach, as articulated by Arafat, aims for constructive engagement with India, contrasting sharply with the potential fallout from any influence exerted by the Pakistani military establishment. It is crucial for the populace to remain informed about how these dynamics play out in real-time.
NationPress
18/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Mohammad Ali Arafat say about the interim government?
He criticized the government, stating it is backed by Islamist extremists and cannot understand the relationship with India.
What was the outcome of the ICT's recent verdict?
The ICT sentenced the former Prime Minister to death for "crimes against humanity" and convicted two of her aides.
How does Arafat view Bangladesh's relationship with India?
Arafat believes the relationship is based on mutual interests beyond historical events, particularly the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War.
What is the significance of the Land Boundary Agreement?
The agreement exemplifies Bangladesh and India's ability to resolve disputes peacefully, enhancing regional stability.
What does Arafat suggest about the diplomatic approach towards India?
He advocates for a cooperation-based approach, arguing that influences from the Pakistani military establishment would lead to mutual loss.
