Is Pakistan Blocking the Appointment of UN Security Council Committee Chairs on Terrorism?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The UN Security Council committees focused on terrorism are currently without chairs due to Pakistan's insistence on leading one or more panels. This situation arises amidst opposition from Western nations, which cite Pakistan's conflicts of interest as a major concern. As Pakistan prepares to assume the rotating presidency, the implications of this standoff remain critical.
Key Takeaways
- Pakistan's insistence on chairing UN committees has led to a stalemate.
- Western nations' opposition is rooted in concerns over Pakistan's ties to terrorism.
- The lack of chairs hampers the effectiveness of the UN Security Council.
- Pakistan's role could significantly influence policies towards the Taliban.
- Diplomatic discussions continue as leaders seek solutions.
United Nations, June 2 (NationPress) The committees of the UN Security Council that focus on terrorism currently lack chairs as the year reaches its midpoint, primarily due to Pakistan's persistent demands to lead one or more of the three panels.
According to diplomatic sources, Western nations within the Council have expressed strong opposition to Pakistan chairing any of the panels, including the Counterterrorism Committee and the committees overseeing sanctions against al-Qaeda and other terrorist acts, as well as the Taliban.
These nations argue that Pakistan has a significant conflict of interest, given its harboring of groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, along with its contentious relationship with the Taliban regime in neighboring Afghanistan.
The operations of the Council often require consensus, and Pakistan, as an elected member, is strategically leveraging this to hinder the appointment of committee chairs.
Informal discussions on these matters have taken place.
Last month, Greece’s Permanent Representative, Evangelos Sekeris, who presided over the Council, acknowledged the ongoing difficulties in reaching an agreement regarding committee leadership, stating that they are exploring potential solutions.
In the absence of designated chairs, the rotating presidency of the Council temporarily oversees the panels.
Should the chairs remain unappointed, Pakistan will automatically lead the panels next month, as it assumes the rotating presidency.
During its tenure from 2020 to 2022, India chaired the Counter-Terrorism Committee, with its Permanent Representative, Ruchira Kamboj, even organizing a panel meeting in Mumbai at the sites of the tragic 26/11 terror attacks perpetrated by Pakistan-based terrorists.
Sources indicate that Pakistan was excluded from chairing the Counterterrorism Committee due to its prior claims regarding India’s leadership.
The 1267 Committee, which addresses affiliates of al-Qaeda and the Islamic State, presents a clear conflict of interest for Pakistan, given that the sanctioned organizations and individuals are located within its borders.
Currently, Pakistan is advocating for at least obtaining the chair of the 1988 Taliban Sanctions Committee, named after the Council’s resolution aimed at sanctioning the Taliban.
With its historically fraught relationship with the Taliban, Pakistan hopes to leverage the chair position to wield influence over Afghanistan.
This could allow Pakistan to advocate for either the tightening or relaxation of sanctions, depending on its interests against the Taliban, which it has accused of providing sanctuary to groups hostile to Pakistan.
At present, Pakistan faces significant challenges in achieving this goal due to its ongoing conflicts with the Taliban.
Point of View
It is crucial to present an unbiased view on this issue. The situation surrounding the UN Security Council committees and Pakistan’s assertive stance raises important questions regarding international diplomacy and the balance of power in addressing terrorism. Our focus remains on the integrity and effectiveness of global security efforts.
NationPress
09/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Why are the UN Security Council committees on terrorism without chairs?
The committees lack chairs primarily due to Pakistan's insistence on leading one or more panels, which has faced strong opposition from Western nations citing concerns over Pakistan's conflicts of interest.
What committees are affected by this situation?
The affected committees include the Counterterrorism Committee and the panels dealing with sanctions against al-Qaeda and the Taliban.
What is the significance of Pakistan's role in this situation?
Pakistan, as an elected member, is leveraging its position to block chair appointments, creating a diplomatic impasse that affects the overall functioning of the Security Council.
How does Pakistan's relationship with the Taliban influence this issue?
Pakistan's contentious relationship with the Taliban raises concerns about its potential biases and conflicts of interest in leading committees that address terrorism and sanctions.
What might happen if Pakistan assumes the rotating presidency?
If Pakistan takes on the rotating presidency, it may lead the committees by default, raising further concerns regarding the effectiveness of their operations in combating terrorism.
