Does the Yunus Government Harbor a 'Visceral Hatred' for Hasina and the Awami League?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a recent interview, former Indian diplomat Pinak Ranjan Chakravarty claimed that the conviction of Sheikh Hasina signifies political vendetta. He argues that the interim government's animosity towards Hasina may lead to increased unrest in Bangladesh, prompting serious questions about the future of democracy in the nation.
Key Takeaways
- Political instability is rising in Bangladesh following Hasina's conviction.
- The interim government lacks popular support.
- Political vendetta claims could lead to violence.
- Upcoming elections face significant challenges.
- India must tread carefully in its diplomatic relations.
New Delhi, Nov 17 (NationPress) The former High Commissioner of India to Bangladesh, Pinak Ranjan Chakravarty, labeled the sentencing of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina as “political vendetta”, claiming that those currently in power in Dhaka harbor a “visceral hatred” for her and the Awami League party.
In an interview with IANS, Chakravarty expressed that the interim government of Bangladesh, led by Chief Advisor Muhammad Yunus, lacks popular support and cautioned that the verdict against Hasina could incite further unrest in the nation.
When questioned about the fairness of the death sentence rendered to Sheikh Hasina, he stated, “I think by all accounts, it is political vendetta, which they have been pursuing for quite some time because people who are in power in Dhaka have a visceral hatred for Hasina and the Awami League for a few reasons.” He elaborated that the Jamaat-e-Islami party, which is influential now, participated in the protests and is pressuring the government to impose severe punishments like the death sentence due to their leaders being convicted by a tribunal set up by Hasina for past atrocities.
Chakravarty added, “They blame Hasina for revenge and now they seek revenge.” Additionally, he noted that students are also motivated by feelings of revenge, citing excessive force used during protests that resulted in numerous casualties. Moreover, he pointed out that Professor Yunus himself, who has had personal grievances with Hasina, is part of this vengeful coalition.
The former diplomat's comments followed a ruling from Bangladesh's International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) that sentenced Sheikh Hasina to death for crimes against humanity related to last year's protests. Hasina has denied all allegations against her.
Regarding the political climate in Bangladesh, Chakravarty assessed, “I think we have seen over the last 17-18 months that there has been an interim government which lacks any popular support in the sense that it is not elected.” He warned that the ruling against Hasina could lead to increased violence and instability in Bangladesh.
He expressed skepticism about the upcoming elections scheduled in February, suggesting they may not be conducted fairly as those in power may seek to maintain their control, seeing the Awami League as a significant obstacle due to its continued grassroots support.
In May, the interim government of Bangladesh enforced a gazette notification prohibiting all activities of the Awami League and its affiliates under the Anti-Terrorism Act until the party's trial in the ICT concludes.
When asked how India should approach its relations with Bangladesh amidst these changing dynamics, Chakravarty replied, “We have been dealing in a low key manner with this current government because as a neighbour, we have to deal with the government who is sitting in Dhaka for carrying on day-to-day activities.” He acknowledged that no significant actions have been taken due to the expectation that this government would eventually transition out.
Meanwhile, Deepak Vohra, India's former Ambassador to Poland, remarked that the ICT's verdict would not alter existing relations, emphasizing the strength of India's ties with Hasina.
Point of View
The evolving political situation in Bangladesh raises significant concerns about the stability and democratic integrity of the nation. The perception of political vendetta against Sheikh Hasina, coupled with the lack of popular support for the interim government, suggests a potential escalation of unrest. It is crucial for the international community, especially neighboring countries, to monitor these developments closely, ensuring that democratic principles are upheld in Bangladesh.
NationPress
17/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What led to Sheikh Hasina's conviction?
Sheikh Hasina was convicted by Bangladesh's International Crimes Tribunal for crimes against humanity related to protests last year, which the government claims were violent.
What does the term 'political vendetta' mean in this context?
Political vendetta refers to actions taken against an individual for political reasons, often driven by personal animosity rather than legal justification.
How is the current government in Bangladesh perceived?
The interim government is seen as lacking legitimacy and popular support, with some labeling it unconstitutional.
What impact could this verdict have on Bangladesh's political climate?
The conviction could lead to increased instability and unrest within the country, especially with upcoming elections.
How should India approach its relations with Bangladesh amidst these tensions?
India should navigate its relations cautiously, maintaining diplomatic engagement while monitoring the evolving political dynamics in Bangladesh.
