Did Bengal School Job Case Reveal 269 'Tainted' Teachers Qualified for Interviews?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a shocking revelation, the West Bengal School Service Commission has identified 269 'tainted' teachers who qualified for interviews in a fresh recruitment despite past misconduct. This raises questions about the integrity of the recruitment process and the standards being upheld by the commission. The implications of this case could have far-reaching effects on educational standards in the state.
Key Takeaways
- 269 'tainted' teachers were identified by WBSSC.
- The Supreme Court annulled the 2016 panel.
- New weightage criteria for prior teaching experience has raised concerns.
- The recruitment integrity is under scrutiny.
- Next hearing on December 1.
Kolkata, Nov 29 (NationPress) The West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) has identified 269 "tainted" teachers from the commission's panel for 2016 who not only participated in the fresh recruitment for primary teachers but also successfully qualified for the interview.
In April this year, a division bench of the Supreme Court annulled WBSSC's entire panel from 2016 and prohibited the "tainted" teachers, who were conclusively proven to have obtained teaching positions in state-run schools through bribery, from engaging in the fresh recruitment process.
A petition was recently submitted to the Calcutta High Court claiming that some of these "tainted" teachers not only took part in the written examination for fresh recruitment of higher secondary teachers in September but also qualified for the interview.
According to WBSSC sources, these "tainted" teachers benefited from the new weightage criterion, which awards 10 marks for prior teaching experience.
Following this, the commission scrutinized the backgrounds of candidates who qualified for interviews and identified the 269 "tainted" teachers from the 2016 panel.
However, their applications for the fresh recruitment process were rejected.
WBSSC sources indicated that this list is not definitive, and if additional "tainted" teachers are discovered in the future who qualified for interviews, their applications will also be annulled.
During a hearing on the petition, Justice Amrita Sinha of the Calcutta High Court questioned the criteria used by WBSSC to classify "untainted" teachers from the 2016 panel deemed eligible for the fresh recruitment of secondary and higher secondary teachers this year.
Justice Sinha raised significant concerns about how WBSSC would assess which candidates qualify for the 10-mark weightage for prior teaching experience.
She also noted that it appeared several eligible candidates were excluded from the fresh recruitment process due to the new rules implemented.
Nonetheless, her bench did not issue any specific directives on the matter.
The next hearing is scheduled for December 1, where representatives from the state government and WBSSC will present their arguments.
Point of View
The recent identification of 'tainted' teachers qualifying for interviews in West Bengal raises serious questions about the recruitment standards set by the WBSSC. Transparency and accountability must be prioritized to restore public trust in the educational recruitment process. This matter deserves thorough investigation to ensure that only qualified candidates are appointed in our schools.
NationPress
29/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What does 'tainted' mean in this context?
In this context, 'tainted' refers to teachers who have been implicated in securing jobs through corrupt means, such as bribery.
What action was taken against the 'tainted' teachers?
The Supreme Court annulled the entire 2016 panel and barred these teachers from participating in the fresh recruitment process.
How many teachers are involved?
A total of 269 teachers from the 2016 panel were identified as 'tainted' and qualified for interviews in the fresh recruitment.
What is the significance of the 10-mark weightage criterion?
The 10-mark weightage for prior teaching experience allowed some candidates to qualify for interviews, raising concerns about the fairness of the recruitment process.
When is the next hearing scheduled?
The next hearing regarding this matter is scheduled for December 1.
