Will the Bengal School Job Case Stay Be Vacated?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant ruling, the Calcutta High Court has maintained its stay on the recruitment for supernumerary positions within state-run schools in West Bengal. As protests by aspiring teachers escalate, the legal battle continues to unfold. Stay tuned as we delve into the implications of this decision.
Key Takeaways
- The Calcutta High Court has upheld the stay on supernumerary recruitment.
- A next hearing is set for June 18, which may bring new legal arguments.
- Protests by candidates highlight ongoing frustration with the recruitment process.
- Legal proceedings against the protesters indicate serious implications for free speech.
- The case reflects broader issues within the education sector in West Bengal.
Kolkata, May 20 (NationPress) The Calcutta High Court has opted not to lift the stay that was previously established by its single-judge bench regarding the recruitment for supernumerary positions in the upper-primary sections of state-operated schools in West Bengal.
This stay was initially put in place by Justice Biswajit Basu. Following this, the state government sought to challenge the ruling, leading to a hearing by a division bench comprised of Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Smita Das.
After several days of examination, the division bench decided against vacating the stay that was set by Justice Basu.
The bench remarked that since the case concerning the recruitment of supernumerary posts is still under consideration by the single-judge bench, it would be inappropriate to lift the stay.
The next hearing in this case at the single-judge bench of Justice Basu is slated for June 18. This upcoming session is particularly significant as it may bring forth additional legal arguments for and against the rationale behind supernumerary recruitment.
Recently, a group of aspiring upper-primary teachers demonstrated outside the chambers of a senior advocate from the Calcutta High Court, Bikas Ranjan Bhattacharya, who is also a CPI-M Rajya Sabha member.
The demonstrators expressed their dissatisfaction with Bhattacharya for his legal arguments, which they believe have contributed to the cancellation of educational job opportunities in the state. During the protests, some individuals directed derogatory remarks towards Justice Basu due to his negative comments regarding the alleged school jobs scam.
A suo motu contempt-of-court case has been initiated against the protestors and those orchestrating the demonstrations. This case is currently being examined by a special three-judge bench consisting of Justice Arijit Banerjee, Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharya, and Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj, which was specifically formed to address this issue.
Point of View
It is critical to recognize the ongoing complexities surrounding recruitment processes in education. The Calcutta High Court's decision reflects the need for thorough legal scrutiny to ensure fairness and transparency in hiring practices, particularly in public education.
NationPress
26/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Calcutta High Court's recent ruling on supernumerary posts?
The Calcutta High Court has decided to maintain the stay on recruitment for supernumerary posts in upper-primary sections of state-run schools in West Bengal.
When is the next hearing scheduled?
The next hearing is scheduled for June 18 at the single-judge bench of Justice Biswajit Basu.
Why are candidates protesting?
Candidates are protesting due to concerns that legal arguments presented by certain advocates have led to job cancellations in the education sector.
What legal actions have been taken against the protesters?
A suo motu contempt-of-court case has been filed against the protesters and those orchestrating the demonstrations.
Who are the judges involved in this case?
The case involves Justice Biswajit Basu, Justice Soumen Sen, Justice Smita Das, Justice Arijit Banerjee, Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharya, and Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj.
