Calcutta HC stays Abhishek Banerjee's Amtala office demolition till regular bench

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Calcutta HC stays Abhishek Banerjee's Amtala office demolition till regular bench

Synopsis

A Calcutta High Court single-judge bench halted further demolition of Abhishek Banerjee's Amtala party office on Sunday, but crucially did not undo what had already been razed. With the matter heading to a regular bench and Banerjee alleging police seized laptops and furniture alongside the demolition, this is shaping up as one of West Bengal's sharpest judicial-political flashpoints of 2025.

Key Takeaways

Calcutta High Court on 19 July ordered status quo on further demolition of Abhishek Banerjee 's party office at Amtala , South 24 Parganas .
Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury referred the matter to a regular bench; demolition already carried out remains undisturbed.
Counsel Kishor Datta alleged notice was served on a corporate director rather than the building owner, violating Panchayat rules, and that demolition began on 18 July without prior intimation.
Advocate General Surajit Nath Mitra maintained the June 30 notice was procedurally complete and the building lacked a valid sanction plan.
Abhishek Banerjee alleged on social media that West Bengal Police removed laptops, furniture, and documents from the premises during the demolition.

A single-judge special bench of the Calcutta High Court on Sunday, 19 July ordered a status quo on any further demolition of All India Trinamool Congress (TMC) general secretary and Diamond Harbour Lok Sabha member Abhishek Banerjee's party office at Amtala in South 24 Parganas, West Bengal, pending a hearing before a regular bench. The court, however, did not reverse demolition work already carried out by the district administration.

What the Court Ordered

Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury, presiding over the urgent Sunday hearing, directed that no further action be taken on the building until the matter is placed before a regular bench of the Calcutta High Court. He also ordered that construction-related details be submitted to the regular bench for further scrutiny. The court's intervention stops short of restoring the status of the structure — it freezes only prospective action.

Arguments on Both Sides

Banerjee's counsel and former West Bengal Advocate General Kishor Datta argued that the administration had served demolition notice on a director of the corporate entity that owns the land, rather than on the building's owner — a violation, he said, of Panchayat rules that require notice to be served on the owner first. Datta also accused the district administration of providing inadequate time for a hearing. 'The notice was served on June 30, and on July 8, we were informed that the date of hearing on July 15 was scheduled. After that, the demolition started on July 18 without prior intimation,' Datta argued in court.

Countering those submissions, current Advocate General Surajit Nath Mitra maintained that all procedural details were included in the June 30 notice and that the building had been constructed without a valid building sanction plan.

Banerjee's Social Media Statement

Separately, Abhishek Banerjee — nephew of former West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee — issued a statement on social media on Sunday, alleging that his Diamond Harbour constituency office at Amtala was demolished on Saturday, 18 July, despite Supreme Court and Calcutta High Court rulings holding bulldozer demolitions unconstitutional. In his post, Banerjee alleged: 'Videos show @WBPolice carrying away trunks filled with laptops, printers, documents, tables, chairs, and other furniture alongside BJP goons. This was not demolition — It was theft in uniform, carried out with utter contempt for the rule of law and while the matter remains sub judice before the High Court. Those meant to uphold the law have become lawbreakers. Shame on West Bengal Police!'

Background and Broader Context

The demolition of Abhishek Banerjee's Amtala office comes amid heightened political tensions in West Bengal, where the ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC) and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) have been locked in an escalating confrontation. Bulldozer demolitions of political opponents' properties have drawn repeated judicial scrutiny across India, with the Supreme Court having previously cautioned against their use as an instrument of state action. This case adds to that growing body of contested demolitions now before the courts.

The matter is expected to come up before a regular bench of the Calcutta High Court, where the administration will be required to place full construction and notice details on record.

Point of View

Giving neither side a clean win. The procedural dispute over notice service (owner versus corporate director) is legally significant: if Datta's reading of Panchayat rules holds before the regular bench, the administration's entire action could be on shaky ground. More broadly, this case fits a pattern where state machinery and judicial oversight are in open friction over demolition powers — a tension the Supreme Court has flagged but not fully resolved. The political optics are combustible: a ruling-party MP's office razed, police accused of removing property, and a sub judice matter proceeding regardless. The regular bench hearing will be closely watched.
NationPress
20 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the Calcutta High Court order regarding Abhishek Banerjee's Amtala office?
The Calcutta High Court on 19 July ordered a status quo, directing the administration not to carry out any further demolition of the Amtala party office until a regular bench hears the matter. The court did not reverse or undo demolition work already completed.
Why was Abhishek Banerjee's party office in Amtala demolished?
According to the West Bengal administration, the building at Amtala in South 24 Parganas was constructed without a valid building sanction plan. A notice was reportedly served on 30 June, with a hearing scheduled for 15 July, before demolition began on 18 July.
What are the legal objections raised by Abhishek Banerjee's side?
His counsel, former Advocate General Kishor Datta, argued that the demolition notice was served on a director of the corporate landowner rather than the building's owner, violating Panchayat rules. He also alleged the administration did not give adequate time for a hearing before proceeding with demolition.
What did Abhishek Banerjee allege on social media?
Banerjee alleged that West Bengal Police removed laptops, printers, documents, and furniture from the premises during the demolition, calling it 'theft in uniform.' He also cited Supreme Court and Calcutta High Court rulings against bulldozer demolitions as grounds for challenging the action.
What happens next in the Amtala demolition case?
The matter has been referred to a regular bench of the Calcutta High Court, where the administration must submit full construction and notice details. No further demolition can proceed until that bench concludes its hearing.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 17 hours ago
  2. 18 hours ago
  3. Yesterday
  4. Yesterday
  5. 2 weeks ago
  6. 2 weeks ago
  7. 1 month ago
  8. 1 month ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google