Congress slams Rajnath Singh's 'terrorism has no nationality' remark at SCO as 'shameful clean chit' to Pak
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The Indian National Congress on Wednesday, 29 April accused Defence Minister Rajnath Singh of handing Pakistan a "shameful clean chit" during his address at a Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) conclave in Bishkek, labelling his remarks "anti-national." The charge comes a day after Singh's speech, in which he stated that "terrorism has no nationality and no theology," drew both attention and controversy across political circles in India.
What Rajnath Singh Said at the SCO Meeting
Speaking at the SCO conclave in Bishkek on Tuesday, 28 April, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh invoked Operation Sindoor — India's military response to the Pahalgam terror attack — as proof of the country's zero-tolerance approach toward terrorism. "Operation Sindoor is proof of our zero tolerance approach towards terrorism and its supporters," Singh said, adding that "terror epicentres" are no longer immune to "justifiable punishment."
Singh also called upon the SCO member states to not lose sight of "state-sponsored" cross-border terrorism and argued that there must be no "double standards" in combating the menace — a remark widely interpreted as a pointed reference to Pakistan. The official handle 'RMO India' subsequently shared his statement on social media platform X, quoting him as saying: "We must not forget that terrorism has no nationality and no theology. No grievance, real or supposed, can become an excuse for terrorism and humanitarian loss."
Congress Fires Back: 'Anti-National' and 'Appeasement'
Congress General Secretary (Incharge Communications) Jairam Ramesh shared a video clip of Singh's address on X and launched a sharp attack. "Yesterday, the Defence Minister, obviously with the approval of and at the instance of the Prime Minister, gave a shameful clean chit to Pakistan while speaking in Bishkek," Ramesh said.
Ramesh raised a series of pointed questions: "Is Pakistan not the epicentre of terrorism? Are there no terrorist camps in Pakistan with India as their target? Is there no ideological anti-India indoctrination in Pakistan? Were not the Mumbai and Pahalgam terror attacks masterminded and executed by terrorists from Pakistan?"
He further alleged that the government's evolving posture on Pakistan reflects "the PM's policy of appeasement of the US and calibrated capitulation to China." Drawing a direct comparison, Ramesh said: "The Defence Minister's shocking statements are as anti-national as the PM's bizarre clean chit to China on June 19, 2020."
The Operation Sindoor Context
Operation Sindoor was launched by India in response to the Pahalgam terror attack, which the government attributed to Pakistan-based terror networks. Singh's invocation of the operation at the SCO forum was intended to underscore India's resolve, yet the broader framing of his remarks — particularly the line on terrorism having "no nationality" — has opened a political fault line at home.
Notably, the SCO grouping includes both India and Pakistan as member states, making the forum a diplomatically sensitive platform for such exchanges. Singh's dual messaging — invoking Operation Sindoor while also articulating a universal framing of terrorism — appears calibrated for a multilateral audience, though critics argue it muddies India's bilateral messaging on Pakistan-sponsored terror.
What This Means for India's Diplomatic Posture
The episode surfaces a recurring tension in India's foreign policy: how to maintain a firm bilateral position on Pakistan as a state sponsor of terrorism while engaging multilateral forums that require a degree of universal framing. Congress is seeking to exploit that gap, framing the government's SCO language as a retreat from its own post-Pahalgam hardline stance.
With the political temperature already elevated following Operation Sindoor, the controversy is unlikely to fade quickly. The government has not issued a formal response to the Congress allegations as of Wednesday evening.