Did Dulquer Salmaan Challenge the Seizure of His Luxury Vehicles in Kerala HC?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Dulquer Salmaan, son of superstar Mammootty, has approached the Kerala High Court regarding the seizure of his luxury vehicles by the Customs Department during 'Operation Numkhoor'. His legal challenge raises questions about the implications of ownership and enforcement actions against high-profile individuals.
Key Takeaways
- Dulquer Salmaan is challenging the legality of his vehicle seizure.
- He claims to have provided all necessary documentation for ownership.
- Media speculation has linked the case to anti-national activities, which Salmaan denies.
- The outcome could influence future celebrity property disputes.
- Authorities in Kerala are probing numerous luxury vehicles.
Kochi, Sep 26 (NationPress) The son of renowned superstar Mammootty, actor Dulquer Salmaan, has taken legal action by filing a petition with the Kerala High Court to seek the return of his luxury vehicles that were confiscated by the Customs Department during 'Operation Numkhoor' earlier this week.
In the petition, Salmaan is contesting the legality of the vehicle seizure and is pressing for their swift return.
As per the details in the petition, Customs officials seized one of four vehicles owned by Salmaan, which includes two Land Rovers and two Nissan models.
He asserts that he has presented all requisite documentation to verify his ownership, including payment receipts, thus arguing that the ongoing detention of the vehicle lacks justification. Salmaan stressed that he acquired the cars through lawful cash transactions, with all supporting paperwork available for scrutiny.
Moreover, the petition indicated that despite providing comprehensive documentation, neither the actor nor his representatives have been afforded a fair hearing by the Customs officials.
He claimed that the records related to the seized vehicle were disregarded and demanded the cancellation of the seizure memo issued by the department.
Salmaan contended that the vehicle must be promptly returned to him as no legal violation has taken place.
Additionally, the actor noted that certain media reports have linked the situation to alleged “anti-national activities,” which he described as misleading and harmful to his public image.
He clarified that the vehicle was legitimately purchased, dismissing any grounds for such allegations.
Legal experts speculate that this case may set a notable precedent regarding disputes over the confiscation of high-value personal assets by enforcement agencies.
Currently, Salmaan’s plea has rekindled discussions about the ownership of luxury vehicles among high-profile celebrities and the scrutiny these assets face from enforcement agencies in India.
In Kerala alone, authorities have identified 36 vehicles, while over 150 vehicles remain unaccounted for.
Point of View
We recognize the importance of due process in legal matters, especially those involving high-profile individuals. Dulquer Salmaan's case not only raises questions about vehicle seizures but also highlights the broader implications of enforcement actions against celebrities. We advocate for transparency and fairness in such proceedings.
NationPress
26/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted Dulquer Salmaan to approach the Kerala High Court?
Dulquer Salmaan filed a petition after the Customs Department seized his luxury vehicles during 'Operation Numkhoor', challenging the legality of the seizure.
Which vehicles are involved in the seizure?
The seized vehicles include two Land Rovers and two Nissan models owned by Dulquer Salmaan.
What arguments did Salmaan present in his petition?
Salmaan argued that he provided all necessary documentation to prove ownership and that there was no justification for the vehicle's continued detention.
How has the media portrayed this case?
Some media outlets have linked the case to alleged anti-national activities, which Salmaan claims is misleading and damaging to his reputation.
What are the broader implications of this case?
Legal experts believe this case could set a precedent for how enforcement agencies handle the seizure of high-value personal property.
