Has Jharkhand HC Ordered the Attachment of Panem Coal Mines’ Property for Rs 118 Crore in Unpaid Royalties?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant ruling, the Jharkhand High Court has mandated the attachment of Panem Coal Mines' properties due to unpaid royalties amounting to Rs 118 crore. This ruling highlights ongoing concerns regarding compliance with mining regulations and the welfare of affected communities.
Key Takeaways
- Jharkhand High Court mandates attachment of Panem Coal Mines properties.
- Royalty dues amounting to Rs 118 crore remain unpaid.
- Concerns raised over environmental impact and local community welfare.
- Next court hearing scheduled for August 11.
- Calls for accountability in the mining sector.
Ranchi, Aug 1 (NationPress) The Jharkhand High Court has instructed officials to promptly commence attachment proceedings against Panem Coal Mines for failing to pay royalty dues totaling Rs 118 crore.
The court issued firm directives to ensure the enforcement of a previous attachment order that had not been acted upon.
A division bench headed by Chief Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, while reviewing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on Friday, also mandated the Superintendent of Police of West Bardhaman district in West Bengal to assist the Jharkhand Police in carrying out the property seizure.
During the proceedings, it was disclosed that, despite a warrant being issued and an attachment order authorized by the Certificate Officer of Dumka district, no substantial measures had been taken against Panem Coal Mines.
The court expressed dissatisfaction over the lack of action and mandated strict adherence to its orders.
Panem Coal Mines is a collaborative effort between the Punjab State Electricity Board and a private entity based in Kolkata. The company was granted mining leases by the Jharkhand government for operations in Dumka and Pakur districts.
However, allegations have surfaced that Panem breached lease agreements by mining beyond allowed limits, leading to a financial loss exceeding Rs 100 crore to the state treasury.
Following grievances from local residents and civic organizations, a government probe confirmed the violations and the resulting revenue loss due to unlawful mining activities.
Despite these findings, the state government has reportedly refrained from imposing any significant punitive measures on the company.
Advocate Ram Subhag Singh, who initiated the PIL, informed the court that the company had neglected to provide rehabilitation or essential services to the impacted villagers.
He also raised alarms regarding environmental harm in the mining regions and growing discontent among the local populace due to government inaction.
The High Court has set the next hearing date for August 11.
Point of View
It is crucial to uphold the rule of law and ensure that corporations adhere to their obligations. The Jharkhand High Court's decisive action reflects a commitment to enforcing compliance and protecting the interests of local communities affected by mining activities. As stakeholders, we must advocate for transparency and accountability in resource extraction.
NationPress
02/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current status of Panem Coal Mines regarding royalty payments?
The Jharkhand High Court has ordered the attachment of Panem Coal Mines' property due to unpaid royalties amounting to Rs 118 crore.
What prompted the High Court to take action against Panem Coal Mines?
The action was prompted by the company's failure to comply with previous court orders regarding royalty payments and allegations of illegal mining activities.
How has the local community reacted to the mining activities?
Local residents and civil society organizations have raised concerns about environmental damage and lack of rehabilitation for affected villagers.
What is the next step following the court ruling?
The High Court has scheduled the next hearing for August 11, where further developments will be addressed.
What are the potential consequences for Panem Coal Mines?
If the company fails to resolve the outstanding dues, it may face further legal actions and financial penalties.
