Is the Supreme Court Too Chief Justice-Centric? Justice Abhay S. Oka Thinks So!
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a heartfelt farewell speech, Supreme Court Justice Abhay S. Oka critiques the Chief Justice-centric nature of the apex court, calling for change and diversity. He emphasizes the importance of transparency and the role of AI in improving judicial processes. Justice Oka’s insights reflect on his rich judicial career and the significant contributions of his family.
Key Takeaways
- Change is needed in the Chief Justice-centric structure of the Supreme Court.
- The Supreme Court must reflect diversity in its operations.
- Transparency in judicial processes is crucial.
- AI can improve case management and efficiency.
- Judgeship offers profound satisfaction beyond financial rewards.
New Delhi, May 23 (NationPress) Supreme Court Justice Abhay S. Oka, in his farewell address on Friday at an event hosted by the Supreme Court Bar Association, emphasized that the highest court is overly Chief Justice-centric and that it is time for transformation.
Justice Oka, who will retire on Saturday, remarked that the diversity within the Supreme Court, consisting of 34 judges from various regions, should be mirrored in its operations.
He commended former Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna for his commitment to transparency, noting that he made decisions after consulting with all stakeholders.
Justice Oka expressed confidence in the current Chief Justice BR Gavai, stating that he embodies democratic values.
In his remarks, Justice Oka proposed utilizing Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the case listing process, arguing that enhanced efficiency cannot be achieved without minimizing manual intervention.
Having dedicated nearly 22 years to the judiciary, Justice Oka reflected on how deeply he engaged with his judicial responsibilities, stating that judgeship became intertwined with his life.
He acknowledged that while the income as a judge does not match that of practicing lawyers, the satisfaction derived from the role is incomparable.
"Being a judge is a profound concept. As a lawyer, you face numerous constraints, but as a judge, your only guidance comes from the Constitution, the laws, and your own conscience," Justice Oka remarked.
During his farewell, he honored the sacrifices of his family, particularly his father, who left his civil practice at the Bombay High Court when Justice Oka ascended to the Bench. He asserted that district courts or trial courts should not be labeled as subordinate.
"No court is subordinate. Referring to any court as subordinate contradicts our constitutional principles," he asserted.
Point of View
Emphasizing the necessity for diversity and innovative practices. As the nation reflects on his contributions, it is essential to consider how his insights can shape future judicial reforms, enhancing the effectiveness of the judiciary in a rapidly evolving society.
NationPress
27/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Justice Oka emphasize in his farewell speech?
Justice Oka highlighted the need for transformation in the Supreme Court, which he described as overly Chief Justice-centric, advocating for greater diversity and the use of AI in case listings.
How long did Justice Oka serve as a judge?
Justice Oka served as a judge for nearly 22 years, reflecting on his deep commitment to judicial responsibilities.
What did Justice Oka say about district courts?
He argued that district or trial courts should not be referred to as subordinate, as this contradicts the principles of the Constitution.
Who did Justice Oka commend for their leadership?
He praised former Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna for his transparency initiatives and collaborative decision-making.
What is Justice Oka's view on the role of AI in the judiciary?
He suggested that AI could significantly enhance the case listing process by reducing manual intervention.
