Kerala court raps police over posts exposing minor in Kochi hit-and-run
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
A Kerala sessions court on Saturday, 31 October sharply questioned the police for failing to act against social media posts that revealed the identity of the 17-year-old boy accused in the Mercedes-Benz hit-and-run that killed a 55-year-old scooterist in Kochi the previous week. Ernakulam Additional District and Sessions Judge Kavitha Gangadharan directed the cyber police to submit a report on steps taken against such posts and expressed serious doubts about the course of the investigation.
What the Court Said
Judge Kavitha Gangadharan was unsparing in her remarks. 'I will pass an order directing the cyber police to take down every social media account and post that is revealing the identity of the child in conflict with law. This is a sessions court and a children's court. Why does the cyber police exist? How can this be allowed?' she said during the hearing.
The court directed the investigating officer to appear with the case diary on 2 November. It also sought the diary before deciding whether to cancel the bail granted to the teenager, underlining that it needed to examine investigation records and hear the officer before ruling on the bail cancellation pleas.
The Accident and the Charges
The teenager, son of an additional district judge, was allegedly driving a Mercedes-Benz when it struck a scooter on Container Road at Cheranalloor in the early hours of 25 October. The rider, Jayabalakrishnan, 55, died in the accident.
Police initially booked the boy for rash driving and causing death by negligence and released him on station bail. Following protests by the victim's family and local residents, more serious charges — including culpable homicide not amounting to murder — were added. The boy's father was subsequently named as a co-accused.
The Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) granted bail to the teenager on 26 October. The prosecution and the deceased's family have since moved the sessions court seeking cancellation of that bail.
Court's Scrutiny of the Bail Cancellation Bid
During Saturday's hearing, the judge questioned the logic of the police seeking bail cancellation in the name of investigation. She asked what further evidence required the teenager's custody and why the investigating officer had not approached the JJB for permission to conduct a custodial interview if deemed necessary. The pointed queries signal that the court is not satisfied with the investigation's trajectory so far.
Notably, this case echoes a broader pattern across India where juvenile offenders from influential families attract public outrage after perceived preferential treatment in early stages of proceedings — raising the stakes for how the investigation is ultimately handled.
Political Response and Next Hearing
On Saturday, Kerala Home Minister Ramesh Chennithala and Leader of Opposition Pinarayi Vijayan both visited the home of the deceased, Jayabalakrishnan, signalling the political weight the case has acquired. The matter is scheduled to be heard again on Monday, 2 November, when the investigating officer must appear with the case diary.
How the court rules on the bail cancellation pleas — and whether the cyber police move swiftly on the identity-exposure orders — will determine the next chapter of a case that has already drawn statewide attention.