Why are Kerala's Student Unions Outraged Over New Admission Norms?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Kerala's student unions express outrage over a controversial new admission rule instituted by the Vice Chancellor of Kerala University, demanding applicants declare their criminal status. This contentious measure has sparked political and social backlash, setting the stage for potential unrest in the state's higher education sector.
Key Takeaways
- New admission norm requires affidavits from applicants.
- Affidavit includes questions on criminal involvement.
- Disciplinary actions can follow breaches of the affidavit.
- Strong opposition from student unions highlights political tensions.
- Concerns raised over student rights and integrity.
Thiruvananthapuram, Oct 1 (NationPress) The longstanding rival student organizations - the SFI (CPI-M) and KSU (Congress) have voiced their strong disapproval of Dr. Mohanan Kunnummal, the Vice Chancellor of Kerala University, due to his recent circular issued to affiliated colleges. This directive mandates that applicants submit an affidavit confirming that they are not involved in any criminal proceedings when applying for college admissions.
The affidavit accompanying each application includes four straightforward questions: whether the applicant has faced debarment from any college, whether they are currently an accused in any criminal case, if they have been convicted of crimes against women or other offences, and whether they have engaged in academic dishonesty.
Moreover, the circular states that if a student is found to have breached this undertaking and later becomes an accused in a criminal case, the college council will have the authority to initiate disciplinary measures.
This decision follows concerns regarding students who had previously been debarred for misconduct attempting to re-enroll in courses.
Recently, Kerala University annulled the re-admission of a student barred for three years for using WhatsApp to cheat during an examination.
The university contends that this directive aims to safeguard discipline and uphold academic integrity. However, it has ignited significant political and student dissent.
The Students’ Federation of India has publicly criticized the decision, labeling it as discriminatory and authoritarian. SFI state secretary P.S. Sanjeev expressed in a pointed Facebook post that 'reactionary directives like this will be consigned to the dustbin of history by the populace.'
He claimed that the Vice Chancellor is unqualified for his role and cautioned that widespread protests are likely across campuses.
Similarly, Aloshiyous Xavier, the KSU president, affirmed their commitment to preventing this oppressive rule from being implemented.
As the university remains resolute in enforcing the new regulation and student organizations gear up for protests, a turbulent confrontation appears imminent within Kerala’s higher education landscape.
Point of View
The recent actions taken by Kerala University highlight a critical debate within the education system regarding student rights and institutional integrity. While the intention to maintain discipline is commendable, the execution raises questions about fairness and due process. As the situation evolves, it is imperative to balance the need for accountability with the need for a supportive educational environment.
NationPress
01/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the new admission norm introduced by Kerala University?
The new admission norm requires applicants to submit an affidavit confirming they are not involved in any criminal proceedings when applying for admission to colleges.
What questions are included in the affidavit?
The affidavit includes questions regarding prior debarments from colleges, current criminal accusations, convictions for crimes against women, and engagement in examination malpractice.
What consequences do students face if they violate the affidavit?
Students found to have violated the affidavit may face disciplinary action initiated by the college council.
What has been the response from student unions?
Student unions, particularly the SFI and KSU, have strongly opposed the new rule, labeling it as discriminatory and authoritarian.
What triggered the introduction of this circular?
The circular was introduced in response to concerns about students previously debarred for misconduct attempting to re-enroll in courses.
