Is the K’taka government really targeting Kichcha Sudeep?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Karnataka BJP claims the government is targeting Kichcha Sudeep.
- Shutting down Big Boss studio raises questions about government accountability.
- Allegations suggest a pattern of community targeting.
- Former ministers also faced similar political actions.
- The situation highlights tensions in Karnataka's political landscape.
Bengaluru, Oct 8 (NationPress) The Karnataka BJP has criticized the Congress-led government for its decision to shut down the Big Boss Kannada studio, alleging that this is a deliberate attempt to target Kannada film icon Kichcha Sudeep.
Hosting the 12th season of the reality show 'Big Boss,' Kichcha Sudeep has found himself in the crosshairs of political controversy.
In comments made to the press in Bengaluru, the Leader of Opposition in the Legislative Council, Chalavadi Narayanaswamy, claimed that the government is specifically targeting the actor.
“Previously, they targeted former ministers K.N. Rajanna and B. Nagendra, and now it appears that Sudeep is next. This indicates a pattern of community-based targeting. The government needs to be cautious, as citizens will not accept this behavior,” he stated.
He hinted at a backlash against the government, saying, “The time is approaching when those you are trying to suppress will unite against the government,” a veiled reference to Deputy Chief Minister and State Congress President D.K. Shivakumar.
Shivakumar had previously remarked that he knows how to handle certain individuals within the Kannada film industry.
Both Rajanna and Nagendra, associated with Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and belonging to the ST community, were removed from the cabinet. Rajanna was dismissed after challenging Shivakumar regarding allegations of vote fraud, while Nagendra faced removal due to links with a tribal welfare board scandal. Notably, Kichcha Sudeep shares the same community background.
Questioning the rationale behind the closure of the Big Boss house, Narayanaswamy remarked, “Is this venue a factory? What relevance does the Pollution Control Board have in this matter? Was there any harmful emissions from this place? Genuine polluting factories remain operational, yet they choose to target this venue. What’s the rationale here? It’s merely a residential activity. Will the Pollution Control Board now require permits for every residence?”