What precedent do they set by entering restricted areas? JD(U)'s Neeraj Kumar criticizes INDIA Bloc leaders for their march against SIR
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Neeraj Kumar, a leader from Janata Dal (United), sharply criticizes the protest actions of the INDIA Bloc leaders as they march against the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. He emphasizes the need for procedural adherence and accountability, urging the opposition to reflect on their past inactions.
Key Takeaways
- Neeraj Kumar challenges the INDIA Bloc's protest actions.
- The necessity of following procedures in political demonstrations.
- The importance of accountability in political discourse.
- Calls for evidence regarding vote fraud allegations.
- Administrative issues regarding duplicate EPIC cards.
Patna, Aug 11 (NationPress) Janata Dal (United) leader, Neeraj Kumar, on Monday condemned the INDIA Bloc leaders for their demonstration from Parliament to the Election Commission of India (ECI) office, protesting the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar and claiming vote fraud in Maharashtra and Karnataka.
Kumar urged the Opposition to reflect on their previous lack of action before making new demands.
In a statement to IANS, Neeraj Kumar remarked, “The INDIA Bloc parties are entitled to march to the Election Commission, but what precedent are they establishing when their MPs breach restricted zones? When in power, they advise against crossing barricades; when not in power, they do the opposite. There is a correct process — issuing formal letters, requesting meetings, and adhering to due procedures.”
He continued, “If the SIR matter is so critical to them, they should first acknowledge that during the initial hearing, they did not advocate for an interim order. This is documented in the observations. Do they view the Supreme Court as a constitutional entity or not? If they dismiss the Election Commission, do they also disregard the Supreme Court? If they accept it, they must voice their concerns there as well.”
Neeraj Kumar also reacted to the statement from the Karnataka Chief Electoral Officer (CEO), who on Sunday requested that Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of the Opposition (LoP) in the Lok Sabha, provide evidence to support his claims of “vote theft” in the Mahadevapura Assembly segment during a Press conference on August 7, to facilitate a thorough investigation.
Kumar stated, “The Election Commission is a constitutional body, and the Leader of the Opposition holds a constitutional position. Hence, LoP Rahul Gandhi should respond appropriately.”
Addressing Tejashwi Yadav’s accusation that Bihar's Deputy Chief Minister and BJP leader, Vijay Kumar Sinha, possesses two Electoral Photo Identity Cards, Kumar characterized the issue as administrative rather than political.
“If there are two EPIC cards, one should be revoked by submitting the appropriate form. It’s a case of duplication, not politics. It would be beneficial if this is resolved swiftly,” he concluded.
Point of View
It is crucial to monitor the actions and statements of political leaders. Neeraj Kumar's critique of the INDIA Bloc underscores the importance of following established protocols in political discourse. The integrity of democratic processes relies on the adherence to constitutional norms and the respect for institutional authority.
NationPress
08/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR)?
The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) is a process to update and correct electoral rolls, ensuring that they reflect the current eligible voters accurately.
Who is Neeraj Kumar?
Neeraj Kumar is a prominent leader of the Janata Dal (United) party and has been vocal about various political issues in Bihar.
What are the allegations against Rahul Gandhi?
Rahul Gandhi has been accused of making unfounded claims regarding vote fraud in the Mahadevapura Assembly segment, prompting a call for evidence from the Karnataka Chief Electoral Officer.
What is the significance of the Election Commission?
The Election Commission is a constitutional authority responsible for overseeing free and fair elections in India, including managing electoral rolls.
Why is the issue of duplicate EPIC cards important?
Duplicate Electoral Photo Identity Cards (EPIC) can lead to electoral fraud and discrepancies in voter lists, making their management crucial for electoral integrity.
