Kumaraswamy dares CM Shivakumar, Priyank Kharge to arrest him over Karnataka sting row

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Kumaraswamy dares CM Shivakumar, Priyank Kharge to arrest him over Karnataka sting row

Synopsis

In one of the most combative press conferences Karnataka has seen this year, Union Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy essentially told the state's CM and Home Minister to 'dare to touch me' — and backed it with a detailed allegation that the Congress government is running the same playbook it used against his brother H.D. Revanna. With courts closing for nearly a week from Friday, the next 48 hours could define whether this row becomes a full political crisis.

Key Takeaways

Kumaraswamy dared CM D.K.
Shivakumar and Home Minister Priyank Kharge to arrest him at a press conference on 15 October 2026 in Bengaluru .
Kumaraswamy demanded a probe under a retired judge , rejecting a CBI inquiry and calling for sitting-judge oversight.
He alleged police detained a JD(S) war room youth without notice, confiscated his phone and held him until 8 p.m.
He claimed the sting operation's alleged source had met CM Shivakumar to seek a Section 164 CrPC statement to implicate him.
Kumaraswamy drew a parallel to the detention of his brother H.D.
Revanna , warning the government the same tactic would not work against him.
Courts are set to remain closed for five to six days from Friday, raising the legal stakes of any imminent detentions.

Union Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy on Thursday, 15 October 2026, issued a direct challenge to Karnataka Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar and Home Minister Priyank Kharge to arrest him, as the political storm over the alleged sting operation in Karnataka escalated sharply. Addressing a press conference in Bengaluru, the Janata Dal (Secular) state president accused the Congress-led state government of deploying police and state machinery as instruments of political vendetta against him.

The Dare and the Demand

Kumaraswamy demanded that the alleged sting operation be probed under a retired judge, explicitly rejecting the need for a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) inquiry and instead calling for oversight by a sitting judge. Speaking in combative terms, he said he was prepared to walk into the Bengaluru Police Commissioner's office himself and invite his own arrest — if evidence against him existed.

'Mr Shivakumar and Priyank Kharge, if you have the courage, conduct a probe under a retired judge. I am speaking bravely and am not a coward like you. Do you think I will get scared? You have said that I would be taken into custody if there was an element of suspicion. Dare to touch me. The agitation will begin, and I will see who all you can touch,' he said.

He clarified he would fully cooperate — and even 'support' — action if his party workers were genuinely found to have erred, but drew a sharp distinction between legitimate inquiry and what he described as politically motivated police use.

Allegations of Police Overreach

Kumaraswamy alleged that police had detained a youth associated with his party's war room without serving a formal notice, seized his mobile phone, and kept him at an undisclosed location until 8 p.m., without allowing him to contact his family. A second war room worker, he alleged, was questioned over the phone. He challenged authorities to simultaneously examine the mobile phones of Chief Minister Shivakumar and his personal assistant as part of any credible investigation.

He also warned police officers against arresting innocent party workers during the upcoming period when courts would remain closed for five to six days from Friday, noting that detentions during a judicial recess would leave those arrested without immediate legal recourse.

The Revanna Parallel and the Section 164 Allegation

Kumaraswamy claimed he had received information two days prior that the alleged original source of the sting operation had met Chief Minister Shivakumar to discuss implicating him by obtaining a statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He described this as a blueprint similar to the case involving his brother, former minister and JD(S) MLA H.D. Revanna — whose son, JD(S) MP Prajwal Revanna, has been convicted in a separate case.

'I am not Revanna. You called a woman, obtained a false statement from her and sent him to jail for five days. Do you think you can do the same to me?' he asked, making explicit the family parallel he believes the government is attempting to replicate.

The Broader Political Context

This comes amid ongoing court proceedings initiated by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah in connection with the circulation of the alleged sting operation video. Kumaraswamy referred to a pen drive and YouTube content submitted during those proceedings, arguing that the material needed independent scrutiny in any fair probe. He also raised an alleged audio clip involving Siddaramaiah in the Prajwal Revanna case, questioning why that had not been investigated and accusing the Congress of applying a double standard to allegations involving its own leaders versus its political opponents.

Notably, the JD(S) is currently aligned with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) at the Centre, giving the Karnataka sting row a dimension that cuts across both state and national politics. Kumaraswamy, who apologised to the public for the sharpness of his language, maintained that the state's larger interests were at stake.

What Happens Next

With courts set to remain closed for nearly a week, legal experts say any detentions in this window carry higher political and procedural risk. The state government has not yet formally responded to Kumaraswamy's demand for a retired-judge-led probe. All eyes are now on whether Karnataka Police will escalate action against JD(S) functionaries — and whether the Centre intervenes given Kumaraswamy's Union ministerial position.

Point of View

He frames any police action as persecution and transforms it into a rallying point for JD(S) cadres. The Revanna parallel is deliberate: it binds the narrative of Congress 'misuse of power' across two incidents, helping JD(S) consolidate its Vokkaliga base ahead of local elections. What is missing from most coverage is the court-closure timing: with judicial access suspended for nearly a week from Friday, any detentions now are both harder to challenge immediately and easier to portray as heavy-handed. The Congress government faces a no-win optics problem — act and confirm Kumaraswamy's narrative, or hold back and appear to have blinked.
NationPress
15 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Karnataka sting operation row about?
The row centres on an alleged sting operation video that has drawn competing political claims in Karnataka, with the Congress-led state government and JD(S) Union Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy trading accusations over who is behind it and how the investigation is being conducted. Court proceedings initiated by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah over the video's circulation are already under way, and a pen drive and YouTube content have been submitted as part of those proceedings.
Why is Kumaraswamy daring the Karnataka government to arrest him?
Kumaraswamy is challenging CM Shivakumar and Home Minister Priyank Kharge to arrest him to publicly signal that he has nothing to hide and to frame any police action as political persecution. He argues the state is misusing police and state machinery against him, and says he is willing to walk into the Bengaluru Police Commissioner's office himself if credible evidence exists against him.
What kind of probe is Kumaraswamy demanding?
Kumaraswamy is demanding an inquiry headed by a retired judge, supervised by a sitting judge, and has explicitly rejected the need for a CBI probe. He says he will cooperate fully with any fair investigation and will take responsibility if his party workers are genuinely found to have been at fault.
What is the Section 164 CrPC allegation Kumaraswamy raised?
Kumaraswamy alleged that the person believed to be the original source of the sting operation had met Chief Minister Shivakumar two days before the press conference to discuss obtaining a statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to implicate him. Section 164 allows a magistrate to record confessional or other statements that carry evidentiary weight in court proceedings.
Why is the timing significant, with courts closing from Friday?
Kumaraswamy specifically warned police against arresting innocent party workers during the upcoming period when courts will remain closed for five to six days from Friday. Detentions during a judicial recess reduce the immediate legal recourse available to those held, making the timing politically and legally sensitive for both sides.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 22 hours ago
  2. Yesterday
  3. 4 days ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 1 month ago
  7. 3 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google