Why Did the Madras HC Decline a CBI Probe into the Vijay Rally Stampede?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Madras High Court has highlighted the necessity for stringent SOPs for political events while refusing to initiate a CBI probe into the devastating stampede at actor Vijay’s rally. This incident, which resulted in 41 fatalities, has raised questions about safety protocols at political gatherings.
Key Takeaways
- Madras High Court emphasizes the need for strict SOPs for political events.
- No CBI probe initiated into the stampede incident.
- At least 41 fatalities reported during the rally.
- Government advised to ensure adequate safety measures at future events.
- Political ramifications continue to unfold in Tamil Nadu.
Chennai, Oct 3 (NationPress) The Madras High Court on Friday emphasized the need for rigorous SOPs for political rallies while declining to mandate a CBI investigation into the tragic stampede at actor-politician Vijay’s rally in Karur, which resulted in the loss of at least 41 lives last month.
A bench consisting of M. Dhandapani and M. Jothiraman chose not to advance on a petition filed by BJP leader Uma Anandan requesting a CBI inquiry but allowed the petitioner to return to the court if the investigation does not proceed adequately.
“Do not perceive this court as a platform for political disputes,” the court remarked, questioning the petitioner’s standing in the case.
“If affected individuals come to this court, we will provide support,” the court stated, urging the petitioner to allow the initial stages of the investigation into the incident that occurred on September 27 in Karur.
The BJP leader had requested directions from the High Court for a CBI investigation into the incident, alleging that the deaths were due to official negligence.
The High Court issued its order while reviewing multiple petitions, some of which sought increased compensation for the victims.
The bench acknowledged the Tamil Nadu government’s proposition to develop standard operating procedures (SOPs) for rallies or meetings, prohibiting events near state or national highways.
The court recommended that future political rallies or meetings held at designated venues must ensure appropriate arrangements for drinking water and sanitation facilities.
Moreover, the bench asserted that escape routes and parking provisions should be established to reduce the risk of stampedes.
The stampede at the TVK party rally in Veluswamypuram has ignited a political conflict in the state following the police’s action against party state general secretary Bussy Anand.
Vijay has alleged a conspiracy behind the unfortunate event, while Chief Minister M.K. Stalin accused opposition parties of attempting to leverage tragedies for political gain.
Point of View
It is crucial to recognize the court's decision to prioritize the establishment of safety protocols over a CBI probe. This approach underscores the need for accountability and improved safety measures in political gatherings, ensuring that such tragic incidents do not recur.
NationPress
03/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the Madras High Court's ruling regarding the CBI probe?
The Madras High Court refused to order a CBI investigation into the stampede at Vijay's rally but suggested implementing strict SOPs for future political events.
How many people died in the Vijay rally stampede?
At least 41 individuals lost their lives in the stampede during the rally.
What are SOPs, and why are they important?
SOPs, or standard operating procedures, are protocols designed to ensure safety and organization during events, preventing accidents like stampedes.
What did the court say about the petitioner's request?
The court questioned the petitioner's standing and allowed them to return if the investigation was not conducted properly.
What impact did the stampede have on Tamil Nadu politics?
The stampede has triggered a political conflict, with allegations of conspiracy and exploitation of the tragedy for electoral gains.
