Did Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi Skip All-Party Meetings During UPA's Tenure?

Click to start listening
Did Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi Skip All-Party Meetings During UPA's Tenure?

Synopsis

Amit Malviya's recent comments highlight the absence of key Congress figures during crucial all-party meetings in the UPA era. With a focus on accountability, the BJP contrasts this with PM Modi's proactive approach. As tensions rise in Parliament, the Congress party faces scrutiny over its past engagement in legislative discussions.

Key Takeaways

  • Amit Malviya criticized Congress for not attending crucial meetings.
  • Congress leaders did not participate in all-party discussions.
  • Prime Minister Modi's engagement contrasts with UPA's approach.
  • The ongoing political climate is marked by heightened tensions.
  • Accountability in governance remains a key issue.

New Delhi, July 20 (NationPress) BJP leader Amit Malviya delivered a scathing critique of the Congress party on Sunday, accusing it of hypocrisy and selective amnesia regarding the Prime Minister's involvement in all-party meetings. In a post on X, Malviya stated, "Congress has once again been revealed — blatantly lying about the Prime Minister’s participation in All Party Meetings," as he made a stark comparison between the UPA and NDA eras.

He provided evidence to support his argument, claiming that during the UPA's decade-long governance, neither then-Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh nor Congress President Sonia Gandhi attended a single All-Party Floor Leaders meeting designed to facilitate the smooth operation of Parliament.

“The inaugural meeting took place on August 13, 2013, chaired by Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kamal Nath,” he highlighted, adding that subsequent meetings in December 2013 and February 2014 were also led by ministers.

In contrast, Malviya pointed out that PM Narendra Modi has actively participated since 2014. "Prime Minister Modi initiated his attendance at all-party leaders' meetings from July 2014, establishing a new benchmark for accountability and dialogue," he wrote. Between 2014 and 2021, PM Modi consistently attended these meetings, after which the responsibility shifted back to ministers, reverting to the previous norm.

“Before the Congress party casts blame, they must clarify why Dr. Manmohan Singh or Sonia Gandhi did not attend a single such meeting in a decade,” Malviya challenged.

"The lesson here is clear: Congress lacks memory, consistency, and credibility," the BJP IT cell chief concluded in his X post.

His comments come amidst expectations of a tumultuous session, where the Congress-led INDIA bloc is anticipated to challenge the government on various issues including the Bihar SIR, the Pahalgam terror attack, and US President Donald Trump’s recent remarks regarding the India-Pakistan ceasefire.

Recently, Congress MP Jairam Ramesh dismissed the all-party meeting as merely "a formality," noting that it occurs every session with Rajnath Singh, J.P. Nadda, Kiren Rijiju, and a few others in attendance, yet no significant outcomes arise.

Point of View

It is essential to maintain a balanced perspective. While the BJP's critique of the Congress party raises valid questions about past engagement in legislative processes, it is equally important to acknowledge the broader context of political dynamics and accountability. NationPress stands for transparency and informed discourse.
NationPress
20/07/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Amit Malviya accuse the Congress party of?
Amit Malviya accused the Congress party of hypocrisy and selective amnesia regarding the Prime Minister's attendance at all-party meetings.
Did Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi attend all-party meetings during UPA's tenure?
No, according to Amit Malviya, neither Manmohan Singh nor Sonia Gandhi attended any all-party meetings during the UPA's 10 years in power.
What has been PM Modi's approach to all-party meetings?
Prime Minister Modi has actively participated in all-party meetings since July 2014, setting a new standard for accountability and dialogue.