Is the Mask Off? Rahul Gandhi Accuses RSS-BJP of Undermining Constitutional Spirit
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a fiery statement, Rahul Gandhi critiques the RSS and BJP, alleging their hostility towards foundational constitutional values. This controversy emerges amidst ongoing debates about India's secular identity. Discover the implications of his claims and the broader political discourse they ignite.
Key Takeaways
- Rahul Gandhi's accusations against RSS-BJP highlight deep ideological divides.
- Claims about hostility toward constitutional values raise important questions.
- Debate on 'Secular' and 'Socialist' terms illustrates ongoing political tensions.
- Response from the BJP reflects a broader strategy to manage political narratives.
- Engagement from activists and opposition signifies rising concerns over constitutional integrity.
New Delhi, June 27 (NationPress) In a powerful criticism that has reignited political discussions nationwide, Congress leader and Lok Sabha Opposition Leader, Rahul Gandhi, has targeted the ideological foundation of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its parent organization, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS).
In a post shared on the social media platform X, Rahul Gandhi charged the RSS with having significant discomfort with the fundamental principles of the Indian Constitution -- equality, secularism, and justice -- and attempting to gradually undermine these values.
He proclaimed, “The mask is off,” asserting that the RSS and BJP are not only indifferent to the Constitution but are actively antagonistic toward it.
According to him, their envisioned future for India is influenced by the Manusmriti -- an ancient Hindu scripture -- rather than the inclusive and egalitarian ethos of the Constitution devised by B.R. Ambedkar.
This strong condemnation surfaced as RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale suggested a “debate” regarding the inclusion of the words “Secular” and “Socialist” in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution.
These terms were incorporated during the 42nd Amendment in 1976 under the leadership of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi amidst the Emergency.
While critics argue that this backdrop raises questions about the legitimacy of these terms, supporters view them as essential to the nation’s moral and political framework.
The Congress party swiftly responded, accusing the RSS of plotting to dismantle Ambedkar's democratic framework.
Rahul Gandhi has frequently revisited these ideological divides, recalling the writings of Hindutva ideologue V.D. Savarkar, who contended that the Constitution lacked roots in Indian tradition.
Recalling Savarkar's views, the Congress leader recently reminded Parliament that some leaders within the Sangh believed the “Manusmriti” should serve as the nation's foundational document.
Despite the BJP dismissing these comments as mere political theatrics, Rahul Gandhi's assertions have resonated with activists, Dalit groups, and members of opposition parties who are already alarmed by potential regressive moves against constitutional protections.
Point of View
It is crucial to maintain a balanced perspective. Rahul Gandhi's statements reflect ongoing tensions within Indian politics regarding the interpretation of the Constitution. The discourse surrounding secularism and social justice remains vital for the country's democratic integrity, warranting careful consideration from all political factions.
NationPress
27/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the main accusations made by Rahul Gandhi?
Rahul Gandhi accuses the RSS and BJP of being hostile to the Indian Constitution's principles of equality, secularism, and justice, suggesting they prefer a vision based on the Manusmriti.
What sparked this political debate?
The debate was reignited by comments from RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale regarding the words 'Secular' and 'Socialist' in the Constitution's Preamble.
How has the BJP responded to these accusations?
The BJP has dismissed Rahul Gandhi's comments as political posturing, aiming to downplay the significance of his claims.
What is the historical context of the terms 'Secular' and 'Socialist' in the Constitution?
These terms were added during the 42nd Amendment in 1976, under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, during a politically tumultuous period known as the Emergency.
Why are these discussions important for India?
These discussions are crucial for understanding the ideological underpinnings of India's democracy and the continuing relevance of constitutional protections.
