Jahangir Khan produced in Diamond Harbour court, no lawyer agrees to defend TMC leader

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Jahangir Khan produced in Diamond Harbour court, no lawyer agrees to defend TMC leader

Synopsis

A Trinamool Congress leader arrested near the Nepal border while allegedly fleeing was produced in a West Bengal court — only to find no lawyer willing to defend him. The Bar Association's blanket refusal, combined with charges under six non-bailable sections and his ties to a senior TMC leader, makes this a case that cuts across law, politics, and justice.

Key Takeaways

Jahangir Khan alias 'Pushpa' , a TMC leader from Falta, South 24 Parganas , was produced in Diamond Harbour sub-divisional court on 9 June .
The Diamond Harbour Criminal Court Bar Association announced no advocate would represent him; secretary Sajal Mandal called him a 'notorious criminal' .
Khan faces charges under 6 non-bailable sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , including Sections 117(2), 126(2), 305(B), 324(5), 109 , and 308 .
He was arrested by the West Bengal Police STF near the Nepal border after reportedly attempting to flee following the 24 May election results.
Khan had withdrawn from the Falta Assembly race 48 hours before polling ; BJP won the seat by over 1.09 lakh votes .
A Calcutta High Court protection order in his favour was withdrawn on 26 May , enabling his arrest.

Trinamool Congress leader Jahangir Khan, alias 'Pushpa', from Falta in South 24 Parganas, was produced before the Diamond Harbour sub-divisional court on Tuesday, 9 June amid heavy security deployment, even as the local Bar Association announced that no advocate would represent him. The court appearance follows his dramatic arrest near the Nepal border by the West Bengal Police Special Task Force (STF), where he was allegedly attempting to flee the state.

Security Arrangements at the Court

Extensive security measures were put in place in and around the court premises well before proceedings began. A large contingent of police personnel and central forces was deployed, with multiple cordons established and strict checks enforced at all entry points. The district administration had been on high alert since morning, with authorities keeping a close watch to prevent any disruption or unrest during the hearing.

Bar Association Refuses to Defend the Accused

In an unusual development, the Diamond Harbour Criminal Court Bar Association declared that no member would appear on Khan's behalf. Bar Association secretary Sajal Mandal described Khan as a 'notorious criminal' and confirmed that no advocate was willing to take up his defence. The decision has sparked controversy over the right to legal representation, a fundamental protection under Indian law.

Charges and Legal Background

According to officials, Khan faces charges under multiple serious and non-bailable sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including Sections 117(2), 126(2), 305(B), 324(5), 109, and 308. Investigators said the range of sections reflects the gravity of the allegations, though specific details have been withheld to protect the ongoing probe. A prior case had been registered against him in 2019, and while he had obtained protection from coercive action from the Calcutta High Court, that relief was withdrawn on 26 May, clearing the path for his arrest.

Election Controversy and Disappearance

Khan, a close associate of Trinamool Congress (TMC) general secretary Abhishek Banerjee, had contested the Falta Assembly constituency seat. He withdrew from the race 48 hours before polling on 21 May, though his name remained on the electronic voting machine. When results were declared on 24 May, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) won by a margin of over 1.09 lakh votes; Khan finished fourth with just 7,783 votes. He had been untraceable from the day results were announced until the STF apprehended him acting on a tip-off at the Nepal border.

What Comes Next

With no legal representation secured and charges spanning multiple non-bailable offences, Khan's custody is expected to continue as investigators proceed with the probe. The Bar Association's refusal to defend him raises broader questions about access to justice that courts may need to address. The case is likely to remain politically sensitive given Khan's reported proximity to senior TMC leadership.

Point of View

However understandable as a moral statement, sets a troubling precedent. Every accused person — regardless of the gravity of charges — is entitled to counsel under Indian constitutional law, and a collective boycott by a bar body risks undermining that guarantee. The deeper story here is political: Khan's reported closeness to Abhishek Banerjee, his abrupt withdrawal from the Falta race days before polling, and his subsequent flight toward the Nepal border together suggest a deliberate attempt to distance himself — and possibly others — from accountability. That the Calcutta High Court's protective order was withdrawn just two days after results adds another layer worth scrutiny.
NationPress
12 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is Jahangir Khan alias 'Pushpa'?
Jahangir Khan, alias 'Pushpa', is a Trinamool Congress leader from Falta in South 24 Parganas, West Bengal, and reportedly a close associate of TMC general secretary Abhishek Banerjee. He contested the Falta Assembly seat but withdrew 48 hours before the 21 May polling date.
Why was Jahangir Khan arrested?
Khan was arrested by the West Bengal Police Special Task Force near the Nepal border, where he was allegedly attempting to flee after the 24 May election results. A prior case from 2019 resurfaced after the Calcutta High Court withdrew his protection order on 26 May, enabling the arrest.
What charges does Jahangir Khan face?
He faces charges under six non-bailable sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including Sections 117(2), 126(2), 305(B), 324(5), 109, and 308. Investigators have withheld specific details to protect the ongoing probe.
Why did no lawyer agree to defend Jahangir Khan?
The Diamond Harbour Criminal Court Bar Association announced a collective decision not to represent Khan, with secretary Sajal Mandal stating that no member was willing to defend him given the serious nature of the charges. The decision has drawn controversy over the constitutional right to legal representation.
What were the Falta Assembly election results?
In the Falta Assembly constituency, the BJP won by a margin of over 1.09 lakh votes. Jahangir Khan, despite having withdrawn from the race, remained on the EVM and finished fourth with 7,783 votes when results were declared on 24 May.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 2 months ago
  7. 2 months ago
  8. 2 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google