CJP's Jantar Mantar protest: Opposition backs right to peaceful dissent against ECI

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
CJP's Jantar Mantar protest: Opposition backs right to peaceful dissent against ECI

Synopsis

A CJP-led protest at Jantar Mantar against the Election Commission drew cross-party opposition backing on 10 October, with leaders alleging the SIR process disenfranchised 13 crore voters and demanding CEC Gyanesh Kumar's resignation. Reports of heavy security deployment and Internet suspension at the protest site added a sharp civil-liberties dimension to the already charged electoral integrity debate.

Key Takeaways

The Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) held a protest at Jantar Mantar , New Delhi on 10 October against the Election Commission of India (ECI) .
Protesters and opposition leaders demanded the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar .
Congress leader Husain Dalwai alleged the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process had disenfranchised 13 crore people .
Kodandaram alleged heavy security deployment and Internet suspension around the protest venue.
Opposition voices from Congress , Samajwadi Party , and TJS all backed the constitutional right to peaceful protest.

Opposition leaders across parties on Saturday, 10 October voiced support for the right to peaceful protest as the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) staged a demonstration at Jantar Mantar, New Delhi, against the Election Commission of India (ECI). The protest, which also demanded the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, centred on allegations of electoral malpractice and concerns over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process.

Key Demands and What Sparked the Protest

The CJP's call to gather at Jantar Mantar drew attention from political figures spanning multiple states. At the heart of the demonstration were allegations that the SIR process had allegedly disenfranchised a significant number of voters. Congress leader Husain Dalwai claimed that irregularities in the SIR process had deprived 13 crore people of their right to participate in elections, a charge the Election Commission has not formally responded to, according to available reports.

The protest also explicitly targeted Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, with demonstrators and their supporters demanding his resignation over what they described as electoral malpractice carried out through the Commission.

Opposition Leaders Speak Out

Uttar Pradesh State Congress President Aradhana Mishra Mona underscored the constitutional basis for the demonstration. 'Our Constitution gives every political party and organisation the right to protest peacefully. It is the moral responsibility of political parties and organisations to voice their opinions and hold the government accountable for its wrong policies,' she said.

Samajwadi Party spokesperson Ashutosh Verma noted that the CJP's call had resonated beyond North India. 'People from across the country, not just North India but also South, East and West India, want to join the Cockroach Janata Party's call. Why do they want to come? Because they are convinced that electoral malpractice has taken place through the Election Commission, with Gyanesh Kumar's name being used as a front,' Verma said.

Security Measures and Internet Suspension Draw Criticism

Telangana Jana Samithi (TJS) chief and MLC M. Kodandaram criticised what he described as disproportionate security measures around the protest site. He alleged that heavy security forces had been deployed and that Internet services had been suspended in the Jantar Mantar area, preventing people from reaching the venue.

'Today, on October 10, the Cockroach Janata Party has issued a special call to reach Jantar Mantar to protest against the Election Commission of India. They are also demanding the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. However, heavy security forces have been deployed, and Internet services have been suspended, preventing people from reaching the Jantar Mantar area. I think this is a very big mistake,' Kodandaram said.

Notably, the reported suspension of Internet services — if confirmed — would mark an unusual step in the context of a civilian political protest in the national capital, where such measures are more commonly associated with law-and-order emergencies.

Broader Context: Electoral Integrity Under Scrutiny

This comes amid a wider political debate over the integrity of voter rolls and the conduct of revision exercises by the Election Commission. The SIR process, designed to update electoral rolls, has drawn opposition allegations of selective deletions and enrolment irregularities. Critics argue that without transparent, auditable procedures, such exercises risk undermining public trust in the electoral process.

The Election Commission and its leadership have not, according to available reports, publicly addressed the specific allegations raised at the protest. With demands for CEC Gyanesh Kumar's resignation now formally on the table from multiple opposition voices, the controversy is likely to intensify ahead of any upcoming state or general election cycle.

Point of View

Not a fringe protest. The more significant story, however, may be the reported Internet suspension: if confirmed, using connectivity restrictions against a lawful political assembly in the capital sets a troubling precedent that goes beyond the electoral integrity debate itself. How the Commission and the government respond — or choose not to — will shape the next phase of this controversy.
NationPress
10 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the CJP's Jantar Mantar protest about?
The Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) called a demonstration at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi on 10 October against the Election Commission of India, alleging electoral malpractice and demanding the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The protest also focused on alleged irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process.
What is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process and why is it controversial?
The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) is an Election Commission exercise to update and revise voter rolls. Opposition leaders allege it has been conducted irregularly, with Congress leader Husain Dalwai claiming it deprived 13 crore people of their right to participate in elections — a charge the Election Commission had not formally addressed according to available reports.
Why are opposition leaders demanding CEC Gyanesh Kumar's resignation?
Opposition leaders allege that Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar's tenure has been associated with electoral malpractice and a compromised voter roll revision process. Samajwadi Party spokesperson Ashutosh Verma claimed that people across the country believe electoral malpractice occurred through the Commission 'with Gyanesh Kumar's name being used as a front.'
Were there restrictions placed on the Jantar Mantar protest?
According to Telangana Jana Samithi chief M. Kodandaram, heavy security forces were deployed and Internet services were reportedly suspended in the Jantar Mantar area, preventing some people from reaching the venue. These claims had not been officially confirmed or denied according to available reports.
Which opposition parties backed the CJP protest?
Leaders from the Indian National Congress, the Samajwadi Party, and the Telangana Jana Samithi (TJS) all publicly backed the right to peaceful protest and voiced support for the demonstrators' concerns, though the level of formal party endorsement varied.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 hour ago
  2. 2 hours ago
  3. 2 days ago
  4. 3 days ago
  5. 4 days ago
  6. 6 days ago
  7. 1 week ago
  8. 2 weeks ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google