Did Prakash Raj Appear Before ED in Betting App Case?

Click to start listening
Did Prakash Raj Appear Before ED in Betting App Case?

Synopsis

Actor Prakash Raj recently appeared before the Enforcement Directorate concerning allegations of promoting illegal betting applications. This case involves a wider investigation into various celebrities and their endorsements of betting platforms. Discover the details surrounding the summons and the implications for those involved in this high-profile case.

Key Takeaways

  • Prakash Raj appeared before the Enforcement Directorate regarding illegal betting apps.
  • The investigation includes a total of 29 celebrities.
  • Many actors have stated they ceased contracts over ethical concerns.
  • The ED is probing violations of the Public Gambling Act.
  • Platforms under scrutiny include Junglee Rummy and A23.

Hyderabad, July 30 (NationPress) Actor Prakash Raj made an appearance before the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Wednesday as part of the investigation into the alleged promotion of illegal betting applications.

He arrived at the ED's regional office in Basheerbagh around 10 a.m.

After being booked by the Cyberabad Police alongside other actors in March, Prakash Raj stated that he had ceased his contract to promote an app in 2017 after realizing it was a misstep.

The ED has recently summoned actors Rana Daggubati, Vijay Deverakonda, and Manchu Lakshmi in connection to the case.

Rana Daggubati was initially instructed to appear on July 23 but requested a different date.

Vijay Deverakonda has been asked to show up on August 6, while Manchu Lakshmi is scheduled for August 13.

These four actors are part of a larger group of 29 celebrities implicated by the ED on July 10 for allegedly endorsing illegal betting platforms.

The agency has filed an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) against these actors, social media influencers, and YouTubers for promoting illegal betting sites, breaching the Public Gambling Act of 1867.

This investigation, conducted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, stems from five FIRs lodged in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh.

Notable film actors such as Nidhi Agarwal, Pranitha Subhash, and Ananya Nagella are among those named in the ED's report.

The list also includes television actors, hosts, and social media influencers like Sreemukhi, Shyamala, Varshini Sounderajan, and many others.

These celebrities were previously booked by the Hyderabad and Cyberabad Police, with FIRs filed across multiple police stations.

The ED suspects that endorsements for platforms like Junglee Rummy, A23, JeetWin, Parimatch, and Lotus365 have facilitated significant money laundering through paid promotions.

Following their bookings, several actors denied any wrongdoing, asserting that they had terminated contracts due to ethical concerns.

Point of View

The ongoing investigation into illegal betting applications involving prominent celebrities raises significant ethical questions. It underscores the need for responsible endorsements in the entertainment industry. As these developments unfold, it remains crucial to approach the matter with both fairness and thorough scrutiny, prioritizing transparency and accountability.
NationPress
30/07/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the reason for Prakash Raj's appearance before the ED?
Prakash Raj appeared before the ED in connection with an investigation into the alleged promotion of illegal betting apps.
Who else has been summoned in the case?
Actors Rana Daggubati, Vijay Deverakonda, and Manchu Lakshmi have also been summoned by the ED.
What is the basis of the ED's investigation?
The investigation is based on several FIRs filed in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, probing endorsements that allegedly violate the Public Gambling Act.
What platforms are involved in the allegations?
The allegations involve platforms such as Junglee Rummy, A23, JeetWin, Parimatch, and Lotus365.
What is the response from the celebrities involved?
Many of the celebrities have denied wrongdoing and claimed that they ended their contracts due to ethical concerns.