Court complaint filed against Rahul Gandhi, 4 Oppn MPs over Parliament protest
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
A senior advocate has filed a complaint before the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM), Jamui, in Bihar, against five opposition Members of Parliament — including Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi — alleging that a theatrical protest staged inside the Parliament complex during the Monsoon Session 2026 hurt religious sentiments and undermined the dignity of the House. The case has been registered as Case No. 1004/2026.
Who Has Been Named
The complaint, filed by Rajiv Ranjan, a senior advocate from the Jamui Civil Court, names five MPs: Rahul Gandhi (Leader of the Opposition, Lok Sabha); Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav, Independent MP from Purnea; and Samajwadi Party (SP) MPs Awadhesh Prasad (Faizabad), Ruchi Veera (Moradabad), and Dharmendra Yadav (Azamgarh). The Jamui court is expected to fix a date for hearing the matter.
What the Protest Involved
The demonstration took place inside the Parliament complex during the ongoing Monsoon Session. According to the complaint, Pappu Yadav dressed as a priest and sat with a donation box, while other opposition MPs — including Gandhi — placed money into it as part of a symbolic act. The protest concluded with Yadav running away with the donation box, a theatrical gesture intended to highlight the opposition's allegations of misappropriation of donations linked to the Ram Mandir.
What the Complainant Alleged
Ranjan alleged that the demonstration was staged purely for publicity, even though the underlying issue was already being monitored by the Supreme Court and a Special Investigation Team (SIT). He further claimed the protest hurt the religious sentiments of followers of Sanatan Dharma.
'Rahul Gandhi, Pappu Yadav and other MPs have hurt the religious sentiments of followers of Sanatan Dharma. Followers of Sanatan Dharma are tolerant; that is precisely why these individuals staged such a demonstration,' Ranjan said.
Legal and Political Context
This comes amid a broader political battle over the Ram Mandir donation controversy, which the opposition has sought to amplify through parliamentary proceedings. Notably, the Supreme Court and an SIT are already seized of the underlying matter — a point the complainant used to argue the protest was performative rather than substantive. The allegations in the complaint are yet to be adjudicated, and all named MPs are presumed innocent until the court rules otherwise.
The case marks the latest instance of political demonstrations inside Parliament triggering legal action — a pattern that has grown more frequent in recent sessions. The Jamui court's next step will be to schedule a hearing date.