Will the SC Ensure Protection for the Release of ‘Thug Life’?

Click to start listening
Will the SC Ensure Protection for the Release of ‘Thug Life’?

Synopsis

The Supreme Court has taken a significant step by recording the Karnataka government's promise of protection for the release of ‘Thug Life’. This commitment arises amid tensions following controversial remarks made by Kamal Haasan, highlighting the ongoing battle between artistic expression and societal response.

Key Takeaways

  • The Karnataka government has promised protection for the film 'Thug Life' during its release.
  • The Supreme Court has emphasized the importance of the rule of law in artistic expression.
  • Controversial remarks by Kamal Haasan have led to significant public reaction.
  • The state is responsible for maintaining order and ensuring the safety of all involved.
  • Films with CBFC certification must be screened without undue interference.

New Delhi, June 19 (NationPress) The Supreme Court has officially recorded the assurance provided by the Karnataka government to ensure "protection and security" for the theatrical release of ‘Thug Life’ — a film directed by renowned filmmaker Mani Ratnam and featuring superstar Kamal Haasan — in the state’s cinemas.

A bench comprising Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Manmohan instructed the Karnataka government to initiate legal proceedings should any individual or group attempt to obstruct the film's release through coercive or violent means.

The bench, led by Justice Bhuyan, was addressing a petition that claimed the Karnataka government had hindered the film’s release via “oral directives and police interference”, despite the film receiving certification from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC).

During the film’s audio launch, Kamal Haasan remarked that “Kannada is born out of Tamil”, which incited significant backlash in Karnataka. Following the actor's refusal to apologize, an “extra-judicial ban” was placed on the film’s release in the state, leading to M. Mahesh Reddy, a resident of Bengaluru, filing a public interest litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court.

The Karnataka Home Department, in an affidavit presented to the Supreme Court, asserted that it has not imposed any restrictions on the film’s release. It further stated that if the producers opt to release the movie in Karnataka, the state government will provide "protection and security" for all involved, including the cast, director, producers, exhibitors, and audience.

The affidavit emphasized: "It is the duty and responsibility of the State Government to uphold the fundamental rights of its citizens and maintain the 'Rule of Law' in the state. [It] is submitted that if the movie is released and screened in the State of Karnataka, the State Government, as is duty-bound, shall take all necessary steps to maintain law and order and provide security to all concerned citizens and stakeholders."

On Tuesday, Justice Bhuyan's Bench delivered pointed remarks, stating that it cannot permit mobs and vigilante groups to dominate the streets.

"The rule of law mandates that any film with a CBFC certificate must be allowed to be released, and the state government must facilitate its screening. It cannot be that a film's release is jeopardized by threats of violence against cinemas. We are not mandating that people must watch the film, but it must be released," they stated.

"We cannot allow mobs and vigilante groups to take control of the streets. The rule of law must prevail," the apex court addressed the counsel for the Karnataka government.

Point of View

I believe that the Supreme Court's intervention in the 'Thug Life' issue is crucial for upholding the rule of law and protecting artistic freedoms. In a democratic society, films should not face undue censorship or violence, and the state's role is to safeguard these rights for all citizens.
NationPress
19/06/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What assurance did the Karnataka government give regarding ‘Thug Life’?
The Karnataka government assured the Supreme Court that it would provide 'protection and security' for the film's release in theatres across the state.
What sparked the controversy surrounding the film?
Kamal Haasan's comments during the film’s audio launch, suggesting that 'Kannada is born out of Tamil', led to backlash and an 'extra-judicial ban' on the film's release.
What is the role of the Supreme Court in this matter?
The Supreme Court is ensuring that the rule of law prevails, mandating the release of films that have been certified by the CBFC and protecting the rights of filmmakers.
What actions are being taken to maintain order during the film's release?
The Karnataka government has committed to taking all necessary steps to maintain law and order and ensure security for all stakeholders involved in the film's release.
What does the Supreme Court say about vigilante groups?
The Supreme Court emphasized that it cannot allow mobs and vigilante groups to disrupt the release of films and that the rule of law must prevail.