Why is TVK President Vijay Criticizing DMK's Inaction on the Waqf Act?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a fierce critique, TVK President Vijay calls out the DMK government for its inaction regarding the Waqf Amendment Act. With a Supreme Court hearing approaching, he urges the ruling party to take a stand for minority rights. This article delves into his statements and the ongoing legal battle surrounding this significant issue.
Key Takeaways
- TVK President Vijay criticizes DMK's inaction on the Waqf Amendment Act.
- Supreme Court grants interim relief, halting key provisions of the Act.
- TVK challenges the Act, citing violations of constitutional rights.
- Vijay urges DMK to join the legal battle for minority rights.
- The next Supreme Court hearing is set for May 15.
Chennai, May 14 (NationPress) The President of Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK), Vijay, expressed his discontent with the ruling DMK government in Tamil Nadu on Wednesday, criticizing its lack of action and silence regarding the controversial Waqf Amendment Act.
His statements were made just before a significant Supreme Court hearing, where TVK has been seeking legal remedies. In a pointed remark, Vijay questioned, “While the Kerala government took a stand against the CAA and pursued legal action in the Supreme Court, why has the DMK government failed to demonstrate the same determination concerning the Waqf Amendment?”
He highlighted that although the DMK has publicly opposed the legislation in the Tamil Nadu Assembly, it has not yet taken any formal steps to engage in the legal battle or start other legal actions against the act.
Vijay’s remarks came in light of recent decisions from the Supreme Court, where a bench led by former Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna granted interim relief by halting crucial provisions of the amended Act. The court mandated that no actions be taken on properties already recorded as Waqf or those acknowledged through continuous religious use (Waqf by user).
It also prohibited District Collectors from commencing new proceedings under the amended provisions. Vijay stated that TVK was among the first to contest the Act, expressing concern over its implications for minority rights and constitutional safeguards. The party’s petition, represented by senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, argued that the amendments breached several constitutional articles, including Articles 14, 15, 19, 25, 26, and 29.
Describing the interim stay as a “noteworthy legal success for democratic forces,” Vijay divulged that TVK had filed a rejoinder countering the Centre’s affidavit, raising additional constitutional issues. With the next hearing scheduled for May 15, Vijay reaffirmed his party’s dedication to repealing the Act.
“This is not merely a symbolic protest. We are resolute in our efforts to see this legislation withdrawn. We call upon the DMK government to fulfill its ethical and constitutional responsibilities by joining this legal struggle to safeguard minority rights and uphold the Constitution,” he asserted.
Point of View
The ongoing debate surrounding the Waqf Amendment Act highlights the critical intersection of law, governance, and minority rights in India. It reflects the responsibilities of state governments to actively engage in legislative matters that impact their constituents and the importance of judicial intervention in safeguarding constitutional rights.
NationPress
09/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Waqf Amendment Act?
The Waqf Amendment Act is legislation that amends existing laws regarding Waqf properties, which are properties held for religious or charitable purposes in Islam. It has been contentious due to concerns about its implications for minority rights.
Why is TVK President Vijay criticizing the DMK government?
Vijay is criticizing the DMK government for its perceived inaction and silence regarding the Waqf Amendment Act, especially in contrast to the proactive stance taken by the Kerala government on similar issues.
What is the significance of the Supreme Court hearing?
The Supreme Court hearing is significant as it may determine the legality of the Waqf Amendment Act and its implications for minority rights and constitutional guarantees in India.
What actions has the DMK government taken regarding the Waqf Act?
While the DMK government has publicly opposed the Waqf Amendment Act in the Tamil Nadu Assembly, it has not formally engaged in legal actions against the legislation.
What does TVK aim to achieve regarding the Waqf Act?
TVK aims to repeal the Waqf Amendment Act, asserting that it violates constitutional provisions and jeopardizes minority rights.
