Did UNSC Criticize Pakistan Over J&K Terror Attack?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The United Nations Security Council has taken a strong stance against Pakistan regarding the recent terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir. With escalating tensions between India and Pakistan, the council's inquiries highlight the urgent need for dialogue and restraint. Discover the latest developments in this critical situation.
Key Takeaways
- UNSC reprimands Pakistan regarding the Pahalgam attack.
- 26 people were killed in the terrorist incident.
- Calls for dialogue and restraint were emphasized by the UNSC members.
- Secretary-General Guterres warned against military escalation.
- The Resistance Front claimed responsibility for the attack.
United Nations, May 6 (NationPress) The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) has reprimanded Pakistan and posed critical inquiries regarding the recent terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, during its closed-door session, as tensions between New Delhi and Islamabad continue to rise, according to reports.
The members of the council expressed their condemnation of Islamabad and scrutinized the involvement of the Lashkar-e-Taiba, a group based in Pakistan, in the Pahalgam incident that resulted in the deaths of 26 individuals.
While Pakistan asserted that the meeting met its objectives, reports indicate that it was largely ineffective.
During the session, convened at the request of Pakistan’s Permanent Representative Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, he denied his country's involvement in the terrorist act.
Although the consultation was closed and lacked official records, UNSC members advocated for dialogue and restraint to address the ongoing issues.
Following the meeting, UNSC President Evangelos Sekeris informed the press, "The Security Council is always supportive in such initiatives" aimed at de-escalation. He emphasized that the council holds the responsibility for such efforts and described the meeting as both productive and beneficial. Due to the closed nature of the meeting, its discussions remain confidential, without official documentation.
Assistant Secretary-General Mohamed Khaled Khiari, who provided a briefing during the meeting, indicated a shared desire for de-escalation. Russia’s Deputy Permanent Representative Anna Evstigneeva, present at the meeting, expressed hope for reducing tensions.
Secretary-General Antonio Guterres remarked that the situation is at a "boiling point" and urged both nations to "step back from the brink."
He added, "It is critical -- particularly at this urgent moment -- to avert a military conflict that could easily spiral out of control."
In a strong condemnation of the terrorist massacre that took place in Pahalgam last month, he stated, "I fully understand the intense emotions following this horrific attack."
Importantly, The Resistance Front (TRF), affiliated with the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, claimed responsibility for the attack, which resulted in the deaths of 25 Indians and one Nepalese national.
Point of View
I recognize the severe implications of the UNSC's stance on Pakistan regarding the Pahalgam terror attack. This incident not only raises critical security concerns but also underscores the need for diplomatic dialogue. The council's push for restraint reflects a commitment to preventing further escalation in an already volatile situation. It is essential for nations to engage in constructive discussions to ensure peace and stability in the region.
NationPress
21/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did the UNSC say about Pakistan's involvement in the Pahalgam attack?
The UNSC criticized Pakistan and questioned its involvement, particularly pointing to the role of the Lashkar-e-Taiba in the attack.
How many people were killed in the Pahalgam terror attack?
The Pahalgam terror attack resulted in the deaths of 26 individuals, including 25 Indians and one Nepalese national.
What did Secretary-General Antonio Guterres say about the situation?
Secretary-General Guterres described the situation as being at a 'boiling point' and called for both nations to step back from potential military confrontation.
