Why is WBSSC's Teachers' Recruitment Notification Under Legal Challenge?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
A recent notification from the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) aimed at recruiting teachers has sparked controversy. Legal experts are questioning significant changes in weightage criteria that could affect the recruitment process's fairness, raising concerns about its compliance with Supreme Court directives.
Key Takeaways
- Weightage criteria changes in teacher recruitment have raised legal concerns.
- The Calcutta High Court will address the petition on June 5.
- New weightage for written exams and qualifications could impact fairness.
- Legal experts warn of potential disadvantages for new candidates.
- Past Supreme Court rulings emphasize the importance of consistent criteria.
Kolkata, June 3 (NationPress) The recent announcement made by the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) regarding the recruitment of teachers for vacant positions in state-operated schools has been contested at the Calcutta High Court on Tuesday.
The petition was accepted by the single-judge vacation bench led by Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury. The case is scheduled for a hearing in his bench on June 5.
The petitioner argued that specific aspects of the notification, particularly the revised weightage criteria concerning the total marks distribution in the recruitment process, contravened the Supreme Court's guidelines on new recruitments.
The primary argument against the notification was that the weightage criteria for total marks were altered from those established in 2016.
According to the new notification issued last week, the written examination for the recruitment process will now account for 60 marks, compared to 55 marks for the 2016 panel.
Additionally, the weightage for educational qualifications in the new recruitment process has been reduced to 10 marks, down from 35 marks for the 2016 panel.
Most notably, two new weightage criteria, each worth 10 marks, have been added: “past teaching experience” and “lecture demonstration”.
Following the issuance of the notification, numerous legal experts expressed concerns that it might encounter judicial obstacles due to the modifications in the weightage criteria for total marks.
Legal professionals believed that while the introduction of these new criteria aimed to support teachers from the 2016 panel who had lost their jobs, the changes could disadvantage newly qualified candidates.
They asserted that altering the weightage criteria was fundamentally unlawful, emphasizing that the same criteria applied to the 2016 panel should remain in the new recruitment process.
Their fears materialized when a petition challenging the notification was submitted to the Calcutta High Court, addressing the very issues raised.
On April 3 this year, the division bench of the Supreme Court, consisting of former Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar, upheld a previous ruling by the Calcutta High Court's division bench, which annulled 25,753 school jobs in West Bengal.
The Apex Court also affirmed the Calcutta High Court's observation that the entire panel of 25,753 candidates had to be annulled due to the state government and the commission's failure to differentiate between “untainted” and “tainted” candidates.
The state government and WBSSC have already filed review petitions with the Apex Court regarding this matter.
Point of View
The challenge against WBSSC's notification underscores the critical need for transparency and fairness in recruitment processes. Upholding the principles of equality and adherence to legal standards is paramount, ensuring that every candidate has a fair opportunity regardless of past experiences.
NationPress
27/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What changes were made in the WBSSC recruitment notification?
The WBSSC's new notification altered the weightage criteria, increasing the written examination marks from 55 to 60 and reducing educational qualifications' weightage from 35 to 10 marks.
Why was the notification challenged in court?
The notification was challenged because the changes in weightage criteria were believed to violate Supreme Court directives and could unfairly disadvantage newly qualified candidates.
What is the significance of the upcoming court hearing?
The upcoming court hearing on June 5 will determine whether the notification will proceed or if the challenged changes will be reinstated, impacting the future of many aspiring teachers.
How does this issue relate to previous Supreme Court rulings?
This issue relates to previous Supreme Court rulings that emphasized the need for consistent recruitment criteria, especially after the cancellation of 25,753 school jobs in West Bengal.
What are the potential implications for candidates?
The implications for candidates include the possibility of altered recruitment processes that may favor or disadvantage certain groups, potentially impacting job opportunities for many.
