Did ACC Receive Approval from BCCI for Indo-Pak Match? Danish Kaneria Weighs In
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a controversial analysis of the Asia Cup schedule, Danish Kaneria reveals the possible BCCI involvement in the India-Pakistan match approval. He emphasizes the need for consistency in decisions regarding sports and politics.
Key Takeaways
- Danish Kaneria emphasizes the importance of consistency in sports decisions.
- India-Pakistan matches draw massive viewership and impact cricketing revenue.
- The BCCI should carefully consider its stance on political involvement in sports.
- The ACC likely received approval from the BCCI for the match scheduling.
- Cricket can serve as a bridge between nations if handled correctly.
New Delhi, July 27 (NationPress) Former Pakistani spinner Danish Kaneria shared his insights on the controversial Asia Cup schedule, suggesting that the much-anticipated India-Pakistan match likely emerged after the Asian Cricket Council (ACC) secured a green light from the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI).
In the fixtures announced by the ACC on Saturday, India and Pakistan are slated to clash in the Asia Cup group stage on September 14.
This revelation followed a sensitive incident where the India Champions team withdrew from a scheduled match against Pakistan Champions in the World Championship of Legends.
Kaneria remarked, "Cricket should occur between the two nations... People are discussing it due to a recent incident involving an India-Pakistan match at the World Championship of Legends, which was boycotted by former Indian cricketers. This move raised concerns about India's future participation in events like the Asia Cup or ICC tournaments. The boycott garnered attention, leading many to believe India might not engage in matches against Pakistan."
He added, "However, there was an online meeting attended by Mohsin Naqvi, the chairman of PCB and head of the ACC, along with BCCI representatives. The ACC must have received a green signal from the BCCI, which is why the India-Pakistan match is now scheduled," Kaneria explained to IANS.
Kaneria believes the BCCI should have taken additional time and engaged top leadership before committing to such a significant match.
"I feel the BCCI should have pondered over it more thoroughly before making a decision. There shouldn't be double standards—it can't be a yes one day and a no the next. If you're advocating for patriotism, you must adhere to it consistently. The hype and chaos will only escalate as the match approaches, leading people to question the earlier stances taken by the players."
"Either clearly state that sports and politics are distinct, or maintain a firm position throughout. No double standards. If it’s a no, then let it be a no. If it’s a yes, then affirm it and stand by it," he asserted.
Kaneria pointed out that India's absence from tournaments has significant repercussions—impacting everything from TV rights and sponsorships to global viewership.
"Ultimately, what difference does it make to the BCCI? They generate nearly 99 percent of the cricketing revenue. Major cricketing nations like Australia, England, South Africa, and New Zealand all desire to play India, as their players participate in the IPL, the largest and most lucrative league globally."
"Let’s be honest: if India opts out, TV rights plummet, advertising revenue dwindles, and viewership declines. Just one India-Pakistan match attracts astronomical viewer numbers..." Kaneria added.
He concluded by emphasizing that the BCCI should embrace a transparent and consistent approach. "In a position of power, you must clearly differentiate whether cricket is separate from politics. If patriotism matters, it needs to be upheld consistently. Not just for a day or a week, but always. Changing your stance frequently is not acceptable. Once a decision is made, it should be upheld. This is what puzzled me—why the rapid decision-making?"
Point of View
It is vital to approach this issue with impartiality. The complexities of sports and politics often intertwine, especially in regions with rich cricketing histories. The insights offered by Danish Kaneria serve as a reminder that transparency and consistency are essential for maintaining the integrity of the game. The decision-making processes of governing bodies like the BCCI should be scrutinized to ensure fair play and stability in international cricket.
NationPress
27/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Danish Kaneria say about the India-Pakistan match?
Danish Kaneria suggested that the scheduling of the India-Pakistan match in the Asia Cup followed a green signal from the BCCI, highlighting the need for consistency in decisions regarding sports and politics.
Why is the India-Pakistan match significant?
The India-Pakistan match is significant due to its historical rivalry, drawing massive viewership and impacting TV rights, sponsorships, and global cricketing revenue.
What concerns did Kaneria raise about the BCCI's decision-making?
Kaneria expressed that the BCCI should have taken more time to consult its leadership and avoid making hasty decisions that could imply double standards in their approach to sports and politics.
