Ajmer Dargah case: Court reserves order on 12 impleadment pleas
Synopsis
An Ajmer district court has reserved its order on around 12 impleadment applications in the high-stakes case claiming a Shiv temple once stood within the dargah of Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti. The ruling on who gets to formally participate in the case will set the stage for the next critical phase of this deeply watched religious-site dispute.
Key Takeaways
Ajmer district court reserved its order on ~12 impleadment applications on Saturday, 3 May 2025 .
The original petition was filed by office-bearers of Hindu Sena and Maharana Pratap Sena , claiming a Shiv temple exists within the Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti dargah .
The dargah's Diwan and Khadims also filed an application seeking inclusion as formal parties.
Petitioner Vishnu Gupta stated objections were raised against several pleas on grounds of insufficient facts and merit .
Additional police personnel were deployed at the court premises given the sensitive nature of the case.
The court's order will determine which parties are formally heard in the next phase of proceedings.
An Ajmer district court on Saturday, 3 May 2025, reserved its order following a detailed hearing on approximately 12 impleadment applications linked to a petition claiming the existence of a Shiv temple within the dargah of Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti. The court is expected to pronounce its decision on which parties will be formally admitted to the case on the next date of hearing.
What the Court Heard
The hearing centred on around 12 applications filed under provisions of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), through which various parties have sought to be impleaded — either as plaintiffs or defendants — in the ongoing dispute. After examining arguments from all sides and reviewing supporting documents, the court concluded proceedings and reserved its verdict on the impleadment pleas.
Petitioner Vishnu Gupta said the court heard all applications in detail, adding that it remains to be seen which pleas will be accepted or rejected. Counsel for the petitioners argued that objections were raised against several applications on grounds of insufficient facts and merit.
Who Filed the Original Petition
The original petition was filed by office-bearers of the Hindu Sena and the Maharana Pratap Sena, who have claimed that a Shiv temple once stood at the site of the dargah. The case has been drawing sustained legal and public attention since it was first admitted.
An application was also moved on behalf of the dargah's Diwan (spiritual head) and Khadims (traditional custodians), seeking their formal inclusion as parties in the proceedings. Several Khadims were present in court during Saturday's hearing.
Key Figures Present
Among those present during the proceedings were petitioner Vishnu Gupta, Rajvardhan Singh Parmar, and Sarwar Chishti, along with several Khadims and their legal counsels. The presence of multiple stakeholders underscores the contested nature of representation at this stage of the case.
Security and Sensitivity
In view of the sensitive nature of the matter, additional police personnel were deployed at the court premises on Saturday. This comes amid a broader pattern of heightened security around courts hearing temple-mosque and religious site disputes across India.
The court's forthcoming order on impleadment will determine the composition of parties in the next phase of the proceedings — a decision that could significantly shape the legal trajectory of the dispute.
Point of View
But each procedural step feeds a larger national conversation about the Places of Worship Act and its limits.
NationPress
3 May 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Ajmer dargah Shiv temple case about?
The case involves a petition filed by office-bearers of the Hindu Sena and Maharana Pratap Sena claiming that a Shiv temple once existed within the dargah of Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti in Ajmer. The Ajmer district court is currently hearing the matter and deciding which parties will be formally included in the proceedings.
What did the Ajmer court decide on Saturday?
The court reserved its order after hearing around 12 impleadment applications filed under the Civil Procedure Code. It did not issue an immediate ruling; the decision on which parties will be admitted to the case is expected on the next date of hearing.
Who filed the original petition in the Ajmer dargah case?
The original petition was filed by office-bearers of the Hindu Sena and the Maharana Pratap Sena. They have claimed that a Shiv temple exists within the premises of the Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti dargah.
Why were the dargah's Diwan and Khadims seeking impleadment?
The Diwan (spiritual head) and Khadims (traditional custodians) of the dargah moved an application seeking their formal inclusion as parties in the case, reportedly to ensure the custodial interests of the shrine are represented in the legal proceedings.
Why was extra security deployed at the Ajmer court?
Additional police personnel were deployed at the court premises given the sensitive religious and communal nature of the dispute, according to those present at the location on Saturday.
