BJP alleges Akhilesh Yadav had phone contact with Ram Temple theft accused
Synopsis
BJP has drawn SP chief Akhilesh Yadav directly into the Ram Temple embezzlement case, alleging phone contact between him and accused Tinnu Yadav — while simultaneously targeting Congress's Digvijaya Singh for announcing a lawsuit over temple donation irregularities. The twin offensive signals a coordinated BJP push to put both opposition parties on the defensive over the Ram Temple narrative.
Key Takeaways
BJP spokesperson Ajay Alok alleged on 4 July that Ram Temple embezzlement accused Tinnu Yadav (Ramashankar Yadav) had phone conversations with SP chief Akhilesh Yadav .
Alok warned that further revelations in the Ram Temple embezzlement case are yet to be made public.
Congress leader Digvijaya Singh announced on 3 July his intention to file a lawsuit over alleged financial irregularities in Ram Temple donation funds.
Alok challenged Singh to produce a donation receipt, saying the Ram Mandir Trust would return the amount with interest.
Singh denied being anti-religion, citing his adherence to the Sanatan tradition and completion of the Narmada Parikrama .
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) national spokesperson Ajay Alok on Saturday, 4 July alleged that Ramashankar Yadav alias Tinnu Yadav, one of the accused in the Ram Temple embezzlement case, had held multiple phone conversations with Samajwadi Party (SP) chief Akhilesh Yadav. Alok warned that further revelations in the case were yet to surface, and that the full truth about those behind the alleged thefts would emerge in time.
BJP's Allegations Against the Samajwadi Party
Alok claimed that the SP's conduct was being gradually exposed. 'The actions of the Samajwadi Party are gradually being exposed. It is also being reported that Tinnu Yadav had several phone conversations with Akhilesh Yadav. As more layers are uncovered, the country will come to know the truth about who was behind all these thefts,' he said. He added that the SP had not been able to withstand the displeasure of saints and seers in the past, and would not be able to do so in the future either. The BJP has not provided documentary evidence for the alleged phone contact, and the SP has not yet issued a formal response to the claims.
The Ram Temple Embezzlement Case
The controversy centres on alleged financial irregularities in donations collected for the construction of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. Tinnu Yadav is among those accused in connection with the case. The BJP's allegations linking him to the SP leadership represent a significant political escalation, coming as the opposition has itself begun scrutinising the temple's finances. This is not the first time the Ram Temple project has attracted political crossfire — the construction and its funding have been contested ground since the temple's consecration.
BJP Targets Congress Leader Digvijaya Singh
The BJP spokesperson also launched a sharp attack on Congress leader Digvijaya Singh, calling him the 'biggest atheist and opposer of Lord Ram.' The remarks came after Singh, while participating in a Sadbuddhi Yajna on Friday, 3 July, announced his intention to file a lawsuit over alleged irregularities in the use of Ram Temple donation funds. Singh further stated that if a court found financial misconduct, he would seek the return of his own contribution and redirect it to another recognised religious institution or a Shankaracharya's trust.
Alok's Counter on Digvijaya Singh's Donation Claim
Responding directly to Singh's announcement, Alok said Singh 'should be ashamed' for seeking a refund of his donation to the Ram Temple. He challenged Singh to produce the receipt of his donation and have it published in a newspaper, asserting that the Ram Mandir Trust would then return the amount with interest — because, in his words, 'the donations made by such atheists should not reach the feet of Lord Ram.' Singh, for his part, rejected the charge of being anti-religion, stating that he had always followed the Sanatan tradition, regularly observed religious rituals, and had undertaken the Narmada Parikrama.
What Comes Next
The BJP's claims regarding Tinnu Yadav's alleged contact with Akhilesh Yadav are likely to intensify political pressure on the SP ahead of any further legal proceedings in the embezzlement case. Alok indicated more disclosures were forthcoming. Whether the allegations translate into formal legal action or remain in the political domain will be closely watched in the days ahead.
Point of View
Led by Digvijaya Singh, had just attempted to seize the financial-accountability narrative around the Ram Temple, and the BJP has swiftly turned that into a counter-offensive. The Ram Temple, consecrated with great fanfare, is now a contested political asset for both sides. If the alleged phone-contact evidence materialises in court, it changes the equation significantly; if it does not, the BJP risks overreach on a subject where it holds the strongest symbolic ground.
NationPress
4 Jul 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What has the BJP alleged against Akhilesh Yadav in the Ram Temple case?
BJP spokesperson Ajay Alok alleged on 4 July that Ramashankar Yadav alias Tinnu Yadav, an accused in the Ram Temple embezzlement case, had multiple phone conversations with SP chief Akhilesh Yadav. Alok claimed further revelations were yet to come, though no documentary evidence was presented publicly.
Who is Tinnu Yadav and what is the Ram Temple embezzlement case?
Tinnu Yadav, also known as Ramashankar Yadav, is one of the accused in a case involving alleged financial irregularities in donations collected for the construction of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. The case has drawn significant political attention from both the ruling BJP and opposition parties.
Why did Digvijaya Singh announce a lawsuit over the Ram Temple?
Congress leader Digvijaya Singh announced his intention to file a lawsuit after participating in a Sadbuddhi Yajna on 3 July, citing alleged irregularities in the use of Ram Temple donation funds. He said if a court confirmed financial misconduct, he would seek the return of his own donation and redirect it to another religious institution.
How did the BJP respond to Digvijaya Singh's lawsuit announcement?
BJP spokesperson Ajay Alok challenged Singh to publish his donation receipt in a newspaper, saying the Ram Mandir Trust would then return the amount with interest. He called Singh the 'biggest atheist and opposer of Lord Ram' and said donations from such individuals should not reach the temple.
Has Akhilesh Yadav or the SP responded to the BJP's allegations?
As of the time of reporting, neither Akhilesh Yadav nor the Samajwadi Party had issued a formal public response to the BJP's allegations regarding phone contact with the embezzlement accused.
