Akhilesh Yadav demands CDR probe in Ram Temple theft, UP ministers hit back

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Akhilesh Yadav demands CDR probe in Ram Temple theft, UP ministers hit back

Synopsis

Akhilesh Yadav has escalated his attack on the Ram Temple donation theft SIT, demanding CDR audits and a judicial probe into Trust land deals — and directly implicating Champat Rai through his arrested driver. UP ministers fired back with religious counter-messaging, turning a criminal investigation into a full-blown political confrontation.

Key Takeaways

SP chief Akhilesh Yadav on 9 July challenged the SIT probing alleged embezzlement of Ram Temple donations in Ayodhya .
Yadav demanded a CDR audit of the accused and a judicial probe into all land deals involving Trust officials who have resigned.
Tinnu Yadav , driver to former Trust General Secretary Champat Rai , has been arrested in the case.
Both Champat Rai and former Trustee Anil Mishra have resigned from the Shri Ram Janmbhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust .
Rajbhar , Manoj Pandey , Bhupendra Singh Chaudhary , and Sanjay Nishad defended the SIT and accused the SP of politicising religion.

Samajwadi Party (SP) chief Akhilesh Yadav on Thursday, 9 July challenged the integrity of the Special Investigation Team (SIT) probing alleged embezzlement of donations at Ayodhya's Ram Temple, demanding a call detail records (CDR) audit of the accused and full accountability from senior officials of the Shri Ram Janmbhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust. The remarks drew sharp rebuttals from multiple Uttar Pradesh ministers, who accused the SP chief of politicising religion.

What Akhilesh Yadav Said

Posting on X, Yadav questioned the SIT's conduct, alleging that the accused were being given undue latitude. 'What kind of restriction is this where the police are opening the door to welcome the accused? How can someone whose name isn't in the interim report be in the final one?' he wrote.

Yadav drew a pointed reference to Champat Rai, the Trust's former General Secretary, whose driver Tinnu Yadav has been arrested in the case. 'If the driver gets trapped, the owner gets trapped too,' he said. He further claimed that a CDR pull would reveal that 'the most calls came from BJP folks themselves.'

Calling for the dissolution of the entire trust, Yadav argued that resignations alone — referring to those of Champat Rai and former Trustee Anil Mishra — should not shield officials from scrutiny. 'Mere resignation whitewashing won't cut it. For all those who've stepped down, a judicial probe must be set up on every land deal and other actions signed off by them. Resignation shouldn't become an escape route,' he said.

UP Ministers Push Back

Uttar Pradesh Minister and Suheldev Bharatiya Samaj Party (SBSP) President O.P. Rajbhar dismissed Yadav's remarks, saying the SP chief should 'first visit and seek the blessings of Lord Ram before making such statements,' adding that the public was not taking his comments seriously given that Yadav has reportedly not visited Ayodhya for darshan.

Minister Manoj Pandey went further, targeting the SP's historical record: 'Those people should stop advising Sanatanis whose hands are stained with the blood of innocent karsevaks. The country does not want to hear from such people.'

Minister Bhupendra Singh Chaudhary defended the SIT, asserting that the state government constituted it to ensure a 'fair investigation.' He accused the Opposition of pursuing a 'negative agenda,' alleging that the SP and the Indian National Congress (INC) have 'always worked to insult Sanatan Dharma, saints, and our monasteries and temples.'

Minister Sanjay Nishad said: 'When Ram Temple was being built, questions were raised on faith. Now, Lord Ram is being used for politics.'

Background: The Ram Temple Donation Case

The SIT was set up following allegations of financial irregularities involving donations collected at the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. The arrest of Tinnu Yadav, driver to former General Secretary Champat Rai, brought the case into sharp political focus. Both Champat Rai and former Trustee Anil Mishra have since resigned from the Trust, though their departures have not quieted opposition demands for a broader judicial inquiry.

What Comes Next

With the SIT probe ongoing and opposition pressure mounting for a CDR-based audit and judicial oversight of Trust land deals, the case is set to remain a flashpoint between the BJP-led state government and the SP. The outcome of the investigation — and whether it reaches beyond the driver to senior figures — will be closely watched ahead of the state's political calendar.

Point of View

And both sides are playing to their bases rather than to the facts. Yadav's CDR demand is a legitimate investigative ask — call records are standard evidence in financial crime cases — but framing it as a BJP exposé undercuts its credibility. The BJP's counter, which questions Yadav's temple visits rather than addressing the substance of the SIT's scope, is a deflection that does little to reassure the public about the probe's independence. The real question — whether the SIT's mandate covers Trust officials above the driver level — remains unanswered, and that silence is the most telling detail in this story.
NationPress
9 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Ram Temple donation theft case?
The case involves alleged embezzlement of donations collected at the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. The SIT probe came into sharp focus after the arrest of Tinnu Yadav, driver to former Trust General Secretary Champat Rai, on charges linked to the alleged financial irregularities.
What has Akhilesh Yadav demanded in the Ram Temple SIT probe?
Yadav has demanded a CDR (call detail records) audit of the accused, dissolution of the Shri Ram Janmbhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust, and a judicial probe into all land deals and decisions made by officials who have resigned, including Champat Rai and Anil Mishra.
Why did Champat Rai and Anil Mishra resign from the Ram Temple Trust?
Both Champat Rai, the Trust's former General Secretary, and former Trustee Anil Mishra resigned amid the controversy surrounding the donation theft case. Yadav has argued that their resignations should not shield them from a judicial inquiry.
How did UP ministers respond to Akhilesh Yadav's remarks?
Multiple UP ministers dismissed Yadav's comments. O.P. Rajbhar said Yadav should seek Lord Ram's blessings before speaking; Bhupendra Singh Chaudhary defended the SIT as constituted for a fair investigation; Manoj Pandey and Sanjay Nishad accused the SP of politicising religion.
What is the political significance of this dispute?
The row reflects a broader contest between the BJP-led UP government and the SP over the Ram Temple narrative ahead of the state's political calendar. The BJP has sought to keep the temple as a symbol of governance achievement, while the SP is using the donation scandal to question the ruling party's stewardship of the shrine.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 5 hours ago
  2. Yesterday
  3. Yesterday
  4. 3 days ago
  5. 1 week ago
  6. 2 weeks ago
  7. 2 weeks ago
  8. 1 month ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google