CBI registers ₹24.81 crore Union Bank fraud case against Vijayawada firm

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
CBI registers ₹24.81 crore Union Bank fraud case against Vijayawada firm

Synopsis

The CBI has booked a Vijayawada steel firm and its four directors for allegedly defrauding Union Bank of India of ₹24.81 crore — using fabricated stock statements, shell entities, and unauthorised director changes. The account turned NPA in June 2025, with dues now crossing ₹26 crore. The case exposes a textbook loan fraud playbook increasingly common in mid-sized industrial borrowers.

Key Takeaways

CBI registered an FIR on 18 August 2025 against Omkara Vijayalakshmi Strips Pvt Ltd and its four directors for alleged fraud against Union Bank of India .
The alleged wrongful loss to the bank is ₹24,81,47,000 ; outstanding dues including interest stand at approximately ₹26.05 crore .
The borrower declared stock worth ₹23.85 crore , while physically available stock was valued at only around ₹25 lakh .
Two directors allegedly resigned within six months of loan sanction and floated a new firm, M/s Nerro Steels Pvt Ltd , with a ₹6.01 crore charge at Canara Bank .
Two shell entities — Maruthi Traders and Sri Durga Bhavani Steels — incorporated in 2024 are suspected of being used to siphon funds and inflate turnover.
The account was classified NPA on 23 June 2025 due to non-servicing of interest.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has registered a fraud case against Vijayawada-based Omkara Vijayalakshmi Strips Pvt Ltd and its four directors over an alleged ₹24.81 crore fraud involving Union Bank of India. The First Information Report (FIR) was filed on 18 August 2025 at CBI ACB Visakhapatnam, based on a written complaint by Chinari Srikanta Patro, Assistant General Manager, Union Bank of India, Zonal Office, Vijayawada.

Who Has Been Named

The FIR lists Omkara Vijayalakshmi Strips Pvt Ltd as accused number one. Its directors — Kota Bhanu Prasad, Kota Sravani, Kota Prudvi Venkata Teja, and Kota Rahul Sai Balaji — are named as accused numbers two through five. Unknown public servants and private individuals have also been included as accused.

The case has been registered under Sections 120-B, 406, 420, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code; relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS); and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, as amended in 2018.

How the Alleged Fraud Was Executed

According to the FIR, the company — incorporated in 2017 and engaged in manufacturing electronic resistance welded (ERW) galvanised pipes and steel products — approached Union Bank of India's Suryaraopeta Branch, Vijayawada in 2024 to take over its existing loan from Karur Vysya Bank. The directors allegedly submitted false financial statements and fabricated documents to secure the facility.

Based on these documents, the bank sanctioned fund-based and non-fund-based credit facilities aggregating to ₹24.98 crore on 22 February 2024. The borrowers reportedly offered stocks, book debts, plant and machinery as primary security, along with mortgage of immovable properties as collateral.

A subsequent unit inspection, however, allegedly uncovered a stark discrepancy: the borrower had declared stock worth ₹23.85 crore, while physically available stock was valued at only approximately ₹25 lakh — with no commensurate evidence of sales or turnover.

Red Flags: Shell Entities and Director Exits

The FIR states that two directors resigned within six months of the loan sanction without obtaining prior permission from the sanctioning authority, and subsequently floated a new company, M/s Nerro Steels Pvt Ltd, which carried a charge of ₹6.01 crore with Canara Bank.

Investigators also flagged suspicious transactions involving two firms — Maruthi Traders and Sri Durga Bhavani Steels — both established only in 2024 and found to be non-operational at the time of the bank's enquiry. According to the FIR, major credits amounting to ₹32.19 crore out of total credits of ₹67.54 crore were observed in the name of Sri Durga Bhavani Steels. These entities are believed to have been used for siphoning funds and artificially inflating turnover to enhance credit eligibility.

The FIR further noted routing of transactions through current accounts, unauthorised changes of directors and statutory auditors, and movement of stock from the unit without intimation to the bank.

Account Classified NPA, Dues Cross ₹26 Crore

The account was classified as a Non-Performing Asset (NPA) on 23 June 2025 due to non-servicing of interest. Outstanding dues, including accrued interest, stood at approximately ₹26.05 crore at the time of classification. The FIR puts the alleged wrongful loss to the bank at ₹24,81,47,000, with a corresponding wrongful gain to the accused.

The CBI's move is part of a broader pattern of enforcement action against bank fraud in Andhra Pradesh; investigators are now expected to examine financial records, audit trails, and the role of any bank insiders who may have facilitated the loan approval.

Point of View

Then using shell entities to cycle funds back and obscure the trail. What makes it notable is the speed of deterioration: the loan was sanctioned in February 2024 and turned NPA by June 2025 — barely 16 months. That timeline raises pointed questions about the bank's due-diligence and post-sanction monitoring processes. The involvement of unnamed public servants as accused signals that investigators suspect an insider dimension, which, if proven, would elevate this from a borrower fraud to a systemic failure.
NationPress
21 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the CBI case against Omkara Vijayalakshmi Strips Pvt Ltd?
The CBI has registered an FIR against Vijayawada-based Omkara Vijayalakshmi Strips Pvt Ltd and its four directors for allegedly defrauding Union Bank of India of ₹24.81 crore. The fraud allegedly involved submitting false financial statements to secure a loan takeover from Karur Vysya Bank and subsequently siphoning funds through shell entities.
When was the FIR registered and by whom?
The FIR was registered on 18 August 2025 at CBI ACB Visakhapatnam, based on a written complaint filed by Chinari Srikanta Patro, Assistant General Manager, Union Bank of India, Zonal Office, Vijayawada.
How was the alleged fraud carried out?
According to the FIR, the company's directors allegedly submitted fabricated financial statements to secure credit facilities of ₹24.98 crore. A unit inspection found physically available stock worth only ₹25 lakh against a declared value of ₹23.85 crore. Funds were allegedly routed through two shell entities incorporated in 2024 to inflate turnover and siphon money.
When did the loan account turn NPA?
The account was classified as a Non-Performing Asset (NPA) on 23 June 2025, due to non-servicing of interest. Outstanding dues, including accrued interest, had risen to approximately ₹26.05 crore by that date.
Who else is under investigation in this case?
Besides the four named directors, unknown public servants and private individuals have been listed as accused in the FIR, indicating that investigators suspect potential insider involvement within the bank or related institutions. The CBI is expected to examine financial records and audit trails as the probe advances.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 weeks ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 3 months ago
  4. 3 months ago
  5. 4 months ago
  6. 4 months ago
  7. 5 months ago
  8. 8 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google