Muslim cleric accuses Akhilesh Yadav of 'soft-Hindutva' tilt ahead of UP 2027 polls

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Muslim cleric accuses Akhilesh Yadav of 'soft-Hindutva' tilt ahead of UP 2027 polls

Synopsis

A senior Muslim cleric has publicly accused Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav of pursuing ‘soft Hindutva’ and treating Muslim voters as captive supporters ahead of the 2027 UP polls. The charge — from All India Muslim Jamaat president Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi Barelvi — signals rising friction between sections of the Muslim clergy and the SP, complicating Yadav’s electoral calculus in a state where Muslim voters form roughly 19% of the electorate.

Key Takeaways

All India Muslim Jamaat President Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi Barelvi accused Akhilesh Yadav of adopting a ‘soft-Hindutva’ stance on 22 September in Bareilly .
The cleric alleged Yadav has stayed silent on the Babri Masjid , Gyanvapi Mosque , Shahi Idgah row, Sambhal , and the Waqf (Amendment) Act .
Maulana Shahabuddin accused the SP of treating Muslim voters as ‘bonded labourers’ with nowhere else to go.
He predicted that Yadav’s ambitions in the 2027 UP Assembly elections would ‘be dashed.’ This follows an earlier charge by the same cleric calling Akhilesh Yadav an ‘agent of the BJP .’

All India Muslim Jamaat National President Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi Barelvi on Tuesday, 22 September sharply criticised Samajwadi Party (SP) President Akhilesh Yadav, alleging that he has adopted a ‘soft-Hindutva’ posture in a calculated bid to consolidate Hindu votes ahead of the Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections in 2027. The remarks, made in Bareilly, add to a growing rift between sections of the Muslim clergy and the SP — a party that has traditionally relied on Muslim voters as a core constituency.

What Maulana Shahabuddin Alleged

Speaking publicly, Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi Barelvi said: “All of Samajwadi Party leader Akhilesh Yadav’s efforts and struggles are aimed at capturing power in 2027; he is desperate to secure the seat of authority by any means.” He alleged that this desperation is driving Yadav toward a ‘soft Hindutva’ position and a deliberate silence on issues affecting the Muslim community.

The cleric further alleged that Akhilesh Yadav has made no public statement on a string of sensitive Muslim-interest issues — including the Babri Masjid, the Gyanvapi Mosque controversy in Varanasi, the Shahi Idgah Mosque row in Mathura, developments in Sambhal, and the Waqf (Amendment) Act. “In short, he has maintained silence on every issue affecting Muslims — whether it involved the demolition of shrines or the use of bulldozers against mosques and madrasas,” Maulana Shahabuddin said.

The ‘Bonded Labour’ Charge

One of the sharpest accusations levelled by the cleric was that the SP leadership views Muslim voters as captive supporters with nowhere else to go. “He (Akhilesh) believes that the Muslims have nowhere else to go and will inevitably return to the fold; this is the mindset of the Samajwadi Party,” Maulana Shahabuddin alleged, describing this as treating the community as ‘bonded labourers.’

He also dismissed what he characterised as occasional, low-effort social media engagement by Yadav, saying: “Occasionally, according to his mood, he might have posted something from the comfort of his room, but nothing more than that.” The cleric predicted that Yadav’s 2027 electoral ambitions would ultimately “be dashed.”

Background and Pattern of Criticism

This is not the first time Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi Barelvi has targeted the SP chief. He had previously called Akhilesh Yadav an ‘agent of the BJP’ and accused him of ‘mocking’ the BJP-led alliance in Uttar Pradesh, suggesting a sustained pattern of criticism from the All India Muslim Jamaat towards the SP leadership.

Notably, the timing is significant: with UP’s 2027 Assembly elections on the horizon, political actors across the spectrum are recalibrating their outreach strategies. The ‘soft Hindutva’ charge against opposition leaders is not new in Indian politics — it has previously been directed at Congress leaders as well — but its deployment by a senior Muslim cleric against a key non-BJP figure in Uttar Pradesh underscores the pressure the SP faces from multiple directions.

What This Means for UP Politics

The SP has not publicly responded to the latest round of criticism from Maulana Shahabuddin. If the perception of Muslim disillusionment with the SP hardens ahead of 2027, it could complicate the party’s electoral arithmetic in a state where Muslim voters — estimated at roughly 19% of the electorate — have historically been a decisive force. How Akhilesh Yadav navigates this tension between broadening his appeal and retaining his base will be one of the defining strategic questions of the UP election cycle.

Point of View

But executing it without a credible counter-narrative risks losing ground on both sides. What mainstream coverage underplays is that the All India Muslim Jamaat does not represent the monolithic Muslim electorate; its leadership has previously made incendiary allegations against multiple parties. The more consequential question is whether this public rupture shifts how Muslim voters and rival parties frame SP’s positioning in the run-up to 2027 — and whether Yadav responds, or doubles down on strategic silence.
NationPress
22 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi Barelvi accuse Akhilesh Yadav of?
Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi Barelvi, president of the All India Muslim Jamaat, accused Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav of adopting a ‘soft-Hindutva’ posture and remaining silent on key Muslim-interest issues to attract Hindu votes ahead of the 2027 UP elections. He alleged the SP treats Muslim voters as ‘bonded labourers’ who have nowhere else to go.
Which issues did the cleric say Akhilesh Yadav has stayed silent on?
According to Maulana Shahabuddin, Akhilesh Yadav has made no substantive public statement on the Babri Masjid, the Gyanvapi Mosque row in Varanasi, the Shahi Idgah Mosque controversy in Mathura, developments in Sambhal, and the Waqf (Amendment) Act.
Has the All India Muslim Jamaat criticised Akhilesh Yadav before?
Yes. Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi Barelvi had earlier called Akhilesh Yadav an ‘agent of the BJP’ and accused him of mocking the BJP-led alliance in Uttar Pradesh, indicating a sustained pattern of criticism from the organisation toward the SP leadership.
Why does this matter for the 2027 Uttar Pradesh elections?
Muslim voters account for an estimated 19% of the UP electorate and have historically been a significant support base for the SP. If perceptions of SP’s indifference to Muslim concerns solidify before 2027, it could disrupt the party’s electoral calculations in a closely contested state.
Has the Samajwadi Party responded to these allegations?
As of the time of reporting, the Samajwadi Party had not issued a public response to the latest allegations made by Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi Barelvi.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 6 days ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 3 months ago
  7. 3 months ago
  8. 4 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google