Why Did the Karnataka HC Decline to Quash Summons to Former CM Yediyurappa?

Click to start listening
Why Did the Karnataka HC Decline to Quash Summons to Former CM Yediyurappa?

Synopsis

The Karnataka High Court has upheld a summons against former CM Yediyurappa in a high-profile POCSO case. As the main accused, he faces serious allegations amid political turmoil, challenging the credibility of the charges. This situation raises critical questions about justice and political influence.

Key Takeaways

  • The Karnataka High Court upheld summons against B.S. Yediyurappa.
  • The case involves serious allegations under the POCSO Act.
  • Yediyurappa has denied all accusations, citing a desire to help.
  • The legal proceedings highlight the intersection of politics and justice.
  • The court allows for potential exemptions in personal appearances.

Bengaluru, Nov 13 (NationPress) - The Karnataka High Court has, on Thursday, chosen not to dismiss the summons issued by a Fast Track Court to former Chief Minister B.S. Yediyurappa in connection with a case filed under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. Yediyurappa stands as the principal accused in this matter.

A single-judge bench, presided over by Justice M.I. Arun, rejected the request to overturn the trial court's ruling that took cognisance of the case, thereby mandating Yediyurappa's appearance for trial once the charge sheet is officially recorded.

Nonetheless, the bench instructed the lower court to allow the former CM an exemption from appearing in person whenever his presence is not essential, and indicated that Yediyurappa could submit a separate petition to request such relief.

The Fast Track Court had issued a summons for Yediyurappa and three others on February 28, 2025. In his plea to quash the cognisance order, the FIR, and the charge sheet, Yediyurappa contended that the trial court had not adequately considered the case, and noted that the High Court had previously annulled an earlier order from the same court.

Senior counsel C.V. Nagesh, representing Yediyurappa, highlighted discrepancies in the timeline of the complaint, stating that the alleged incidents on February 2 and 5, 2024 were not reported until March 14, 2024, amid a backdrop of political unrest. He also mentioned that witnesses at the scene had denied any misconduct.

Countering this, Senior Public Prosecutor Prof. Ravivarma Kumar asserted that the trial court had taken cognisance after thoroughly reviewing the available evidence.

The charge sheet reveals that Yediyurappa, along with three others, faces accusations under the POCSO Act and certain sections of the IPC, including 354(A) (sexual harassment), 204 (destroying a document or electronic record), and 214 (offering a bribe to conceal an offence).

The prosecution claims that the complainant approached Yediyurappa’s residence seeking assistance for an alleged sexual assault on her 17-year-old daughter. The charge sheet alleges that Yediyurappa held the girl’s wrist and molested her; it further states that the girl resisted and managed to escape.

Moreover, the charge sheet accuses Yediyurappa of summoning the complainant back after the victim posted a photo and video on social media, offering her Rs 2 lakh in cash, and having the images and video removed from social media and her iPhone gallery. The victim’s mother later passed away on May 26, 2024, in Bengaluru.

Yediyurappa has categorically denied these allegations. He stated that he offered assistance after observing a distressed mother and daughter near his residence, involved the Bengaluru police for support, and provided them with money after hearing their story. “If we come forward to help, these are the consequences we must face. I will confront everything,” he expressed.

Point of View

It is imperative to uphold the principles of fairness and objectivity. The decision by the Karnataka High Court to maintain the summons against former Chief Minister Yediyurappa underscores the legal system's commitment to addressing serious allegations, regardless of political stature. Our focus remains on delivering unbiased and factual reporting on this developing story.
NationPress
13/11/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the POCSO Act?
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act is a law in India aimed at protecting children from sexual abuse and exploitation.
Who is B.S. Yediyurappa?
B.S. Yediyurappa is a prominent Indian politician and former Chief Minister of Karnataka.
What are the allegations against Yediyurappa?
Yediyurappa faces allegations of sexual harassment and bribery in a case filed under the POCSO Act.
What did the Karnataka High Court decide?
The Karnataka High Court refused to quash the summons issued to Yediyurappa and directed him to appear for trial.
Can Yediyurappa seek exemption from personal appearance?
Yes, the court has stated that Yediyurappa can file a separate petition seeking exemption from personal appearance when it is not required.
Nation Press