Kerala High Court: Violence in Visual Media May Have Negative Impact
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Kochi's Kerala High Court highlighted concerns over the portrayal of violence in visual media, suggesting it may negatively affect people. The court emphasized the need to balance this with the rights of free speech during discussions on sexual harassment in the film industry.
Key Takeaways
- The Kerala High Court cautioned against violence in visual media.
- Depictions must consider the impact on public morality.
- Freedom of speech must be balanced with societal values.
- Victims can opt out of prosecution if they choose.
- Further hearings are scheduled for April 4th.
Kochi, March 18 (NationPress) The Kerala High Court expressed on Tuesday that the portrayal of violence in visual media could lead to an undesirable impact on individuals. The extent of such depictions must be evaluated in light of the right to freedom of speech and expression.
This commentary arose during a session of the division bench, which was specifically formed to address issues regarding sexual harassment in the Malayalam film industry, following the release of the Hema Committee report.
In the wake of the Hema report, a Special Investigation Team was established to investigate claims made by purported victims.
Justice A. K. Jayasankaran Nambiar and Justice C. S. Sudha, part of the division bench, remarked, “Violence in visual media can have an undesirable effect on people because it glorifies violence. However, you also possess the freedom of speech and expression. To what degree can this be taken? It hinges on what is regarded as public morality and constitutional morality. These are critical aspects that cannot be overlooked. We must consider the evolution of law and societal views on what is deemed immoral or moral. Is the glorification of violence beneficial, or does it merely reflect the realities of today’s society?”
The court clarified that if a victim, who does not wish to engage in criminal proceedings, receives a notice from the SIT, they can inform the team of their decision not to pursue the matter.
“Any notice issued by any legal authority warrants a basic courtesy of a response from citizens. Personal appearances are not necessary if there are difficulties; responses can be made through legal counsel,” stated the court verbally.
It also noted that individuals feeling pressured by the SIT are entitled to seek the court’s assistance.
The High Court scheduled the case for further deliberation on April 4th.
