Why is BJP's Narayanaswamy Demanding K'taka CM’s Resignation Over Guv-Govt Showdown?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant political drama in Karnataka, the Governor's refusal to read the government-prepared speech leads to strong calls for the Chief Minister's resignation. Leader of Opposition, Chalavadi Narayanaswamy, claims the incident reflects deeper issues of discipline and respect towards constitutional roles.
Key Takeaways
- Governor's refusal to read the government-prepared speech sparked controversy.
- Leader of Opposition demands Chief Minister's resignation.
- Accusations of hooliganism and indiscipline made against Congress members.
- Constitutional obligations of the Governor highlighted.
- Potential for ongoing political conflict in Karnataka.
Bengaluru, Jan 22 (NationPress) In a dramatic turn of events during the joint session of the Karnataka Legislature, Governor Thawar Chand Gehlot refused to deliver the customary speech prepared by the state government and exited after issuing a brief statement. Following this incident, the Leader of Opposition (LoP) in the Council, Chalavadi Narayanaswamy, has called for the immediate resignation of Chief Minister Siddaramaiah.
Speaking with reporters at Vidhana Soudha, Narayanaswamy urged Chief Minister Siddaramaiah to step down, citing the indiscipline exhibited in the House in the Governor's presence.
Narayanaswamy accused the Congress party of engaging in 'hooliganism', previously limited to the streets, and now infiltrating the Legislature.
He further claimed that several members rushed towards the Governor during his address, nearly assaulting him, as reported by various media outlets. "We strongly condemn this. Chief Minister Siddaramaiah must resign immediately, taking responsibility for this hooliganism," he stated.
He condemned the actions against the Governor as unconstitutional, affirming, "Today's actions by the Governor supported the federal framework. We welcome his stance."
Referencing prior comments from BJP MLC C.T. Ravi, Narayanaswamy emphasized that no one should obstruct the Governor during his address or departure. "If anyone obstructs the Governor, those members should be suspended for the entire session. We plan to raise this issue in the House," he added.
Narayanaswamy suggested that the government intentionally set the stage for a confrontation with the Centre. "The content of the speech was disrespectful to the Governor. His rejection of it is a positive development," he remarked.
He reiterated that the Constitution mandates the Chief Minister to receive the Governor with due respect upon arrival and see him off with the same regard when he departs.
"The speech should have showcased the government's accomplishments, policies, and future agendas. Instead, it sought to provoke unconstitutional conflict with the Centre," Narayanaswamy claimed.
Earlier, after the Governor's departure from Vidhana Soudha, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah stated, "It is the constitutional duty of the Governor to address the joint session at the year's start and upon the formation of a new government. Articles 176 and 163 of the Indian Constitution clearly dictate that the Governor cannot read a self-prepared speech. The Cabinet's speech must be presented by the Governor."
"By declining to read the Cabinet-prepared speech and instead offering his own brief address, the Governor acted against the Constitution. This is a constitutional violation," the Chief Minister contended.
"The Constitution clearly states in Articles 176 and 163 that the Governor shall read the Cabinet-prepared speech. This is a blatant violation and an affront to the representatives of the people. This tradition has existed for a long time and has now been breached," he concluded.
Point of View
It's crucial to approach this incident objectively. The ongoing political tussle in Karnataka highlights the delicate balance of power between state and federal authorities. While the opposition's demand for the Chief Minister's resignation reflects their stance on maintaining decorum, it's essential to acknowledge both the constitutional obligations and the nuances involved in governance.
NationPress
23/01/2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What caused the confrontation during the Karnataka Legislature session?
The confrontation arose when Governor Thawar Chand Gehlot refused to read the customary speech prepared by the state government, leading to demands for Chief Minister Siddaramaiah's resignation.
What were the accusations made by Chalavadi Narayanaswamy?
Narayanaswamy accused the Congress party of engaging in hooliganism and claimed that some members threatened the Governor during his address.
What is the constitutional obligation of the Governor in this context?
According to Articles 176 and 163 of the Indian Constitution, the Governor is required to read the speech prepared by the state Cabinet during joint sessions.
How did Chief Minister Siddaramaiah respond to the Governor’s actions?
Siddaramaiah stated that the Governor violated the Constitution by not reading the Cabinet-prepared speech and emphasized the importance of following constitutional traditions.
What implications does this incident have for Karnataka's political landscape?
This incident underscores ongoing tensions between the state government and opposition, potentially influencing future political discourse and actions in Karnataka.
