Has the NGT Responded to Pharma Waste Discharge in Telangana's Sangareddy?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
New Delhi, Oct 26 (NationPress) The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has initiated suo motu action following a news report that brought attention to the protests by local villagers and environmental activists regarding the release of pharmaceutical effluents into Nalla Cheruvu, a water body in Dommadugu village, located in Telangana's Sangareddy district.
A Bench led by Chairperson Justice Prakash Shrivastava acknowledged that this incident raises significant concerns under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, and the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
The Bench remarked, "The news report highlights critical issues regarding adherence to environmental regulations and the enforcement of relevant statutory provisions," which includes Expert Member A. Senthil Vel.
The suo motu case was initiated based on a report published on September 24, which indicated that pharmaceutical companies were supposedly discharging harmful effluents into the lake, leading to urgent demands for action from the residents.
In responding to this situation, the NGT has involved the Central Pollution Control Board, the Telangana State Pollution Control Board, and the District Collector of Sangareddy as respondents.
The counsel for the Telangana PCB acknowledged the notice and requested four weeks to submit a response.
Confirming that the matter is under the jurisdiction of the Southern Zonal Bench, the NGT has ordered the case to be transferred to Chennai for further proceedings, directing all respondents to submit their responses by affidavit at least one week before the next hearing scheduled for December 3.
The NGT stated, "Given that this case falls under the jurisdiction of the Southern Zonal Bench of the Tribunal, the OA is to be transferred to the Southern Zonal Bench, Chennai, for appropriate further action. The original record of the OA must also be sent to the Southern Zonal Bench, Chennai."
Furthermore, it added, "If any respondent files a reply directly without going through their advocate, that respondent must remain present to assist the Tribunal."