Did Rahul Gandhi's Voter List Claims Contradict ECI Records?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Rahul Gandhi alleged voter list discrepancies.
- The CEO of Uttar Pradesh refuted these claims.
- Importance of fact-checking in political discourse.
- Voter suppression concerns are rising.
- Political claims require accuracy during elections.
New Delhi, Aug 7 (NationPress) A significant controversy arose on Thursday when Leader of the Opposition (LoP) in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi held a press conference alleging that the election commission had manipulated data. He claimed that Aditya Srivastava (EPIC No. FPP6437040), son of S.P. Srivastava, and Vishal Singh (EPIC No. INB2722288), son of Mahipal Singh, were registered as voters in multiple constituencies, which contravenes electoral regulations.
To support his assertions, he referenced voter data that was released by the Election Commission of India on March 16, 2025.
However, a fact-check conducted by the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) of Uttar Pradesh indicated that the individuals mentioned are not recorded as voters in the constituencies he claimed.
LoP Rahul Gandhi alleged that Aditya Srivastava is registered as a voter in Assembly Constituency 158 Jogeshwari East, Booth No. 197 in Mumbai, while Vishal Singh is listed in Assembly Constituency 174 Mahadevapura, Booth No. 458 in Bengaluru.
He further claimed both were registered as voters in Assembly Constituency 173, Lucknow East, Booth No. 84.
However, the CEO's office clarified that upon verification, Aditya Srivastava is still enrolled in Assembly Constituency 174, Mahadevapura (Booth No. 458, Part No. 1265), and Vishal Singh is also enrolled in the same constituency (Booth No. 513, Part No. 926).
Their names do not appear in Lucknow East or Varanasi Cantt constituencies as claimed.
This clarification comes amid mounting political tension regarding alleged voter suppression.
The CEO stressed that the allegations made during the Congress press conference were factually “incorrect” and stemmed from a “misreading” of the electoral rolls.
This incident brings to light the need for accurate political claims during election periods and the importance of fact-checking before making public accusations.