Saamana slams MahaYuti over dry fruit feast at Maharashtra drought meet

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Saamana slams MahaYuti over dry fruit feast at Maharashtra drought meet

Synopsis

While Maharashtra farmers watch soybean, cotton, and pulses wither in failed monsoon fields, photographs from a Nanded drought review meeting show ruling politicians feasting on premium dry fruits — and an MP defending it as a fuss over 'Rs 500 worth of cashews.' Shiv Sena (UBT)'s Saamana has turned the imagery into a political grenade, demanding a statewide drought declaration, Rs 50,000 per hectare aid, and a blanket farm loan waiver.

Key Takeaways

Saamana , the Shiv Sena (UBT) mouthpiece, on 21 September 2026 attacked the MahaYuti government over a dry fruit feast at a drought review meeting in Nanded .
Agriculture Minister Dattatray Bharane chaired the review; photographs showed ministers, MLAs, and MPs consuming cashews, almonds, and premium dry fruits during the meeting.
Shinde faction MP Bandu Jadhav defended the feast, dismissing it as 'Rs 500–Rs 1,000 worth of dry fruits' — a remark Saamana called inhuman.
Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis said feasting was improper and urged officials to stay sensitive, but the Thackeray camp rejected his deflection of responsibility.
Crops including soybean, cotton, bajra, maize, tur, moong , and urad have reportedly been ruined across Marathwada , North Maharashtra , and Vidarbha .
Shiv Sena (UBT) has demanded an immediate statewide drought declaration, Rs 50,000 per hectare direct aid, a full blanket farm loan waiver, and a special session of the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly .

Shiv Sena (UBT)'s mouthpiece Saamana on 21 September 2026 launched a blistering attack on the MahaYuti government for what it described as a brazen display of insensitivity — photographs of ministers, MLAs, and MPs feasting on cashews, almonds, and premium dry fruits during an official drought review meeting in Nanded, even as farmers across Marathwada, North Maharashtra, and Vidarbha watch their standing crops wither. The editorial accused the ruling alliance of presiding over a 'demonic rule of fear, hunger, and thirst' as the monsoon retreats from the state.

The Nanded Incident That Sparked the Outrage

The controversy centres on a drought review meeting convened by State Agriculture Minister Dattatray Bharane in Nanded. Photographs that surfaced after the meeting showed elected representatives being served plates of high-end dry fruits — a spectacle Saamana editorial labelled 'rubbing salt on the open wounds of farmers,' contrasting crying farmers in parched fields with politicians reclining in air-conditioned rest houses.

The outrage deepened when Shinde faction MP Bandu Jadhav dismissed the controversy with a remark that critics have called callous: 'Why make such a fuss over cashews and almonds, brother? I was starving, so I ate them. Why create chaos over Rs 500–Rs 1,000 worth of dry fruits?' Saamana termed the remark inhuman, pointing out that those who have allegedly 'swallowed thousands of crores' remain unsatisfied.

Fadnavis Deflects; Thackeray Camp Fires Back

Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis acknowledged that such feasting was improper, deflecting responsibility onto the administration and urging officials to remain sensitive to ground realities. The Thackeray camp rejected this framing outright, arguing that as head of the administration, the Chief Minister cannot distance himself from the conduct of elected representatives. The editorial said politicians should have felt enough shame to refuse the spread in the first place.

This comes amid widespread crop failure in Maharashtra, with soybean, cotton, bajra, maize, tur, moong, and urad reported to have completely dried up and been ruined across drought-hit districts. Critics argue the government has prioritised political manoeuvring over relief delivery.

Loan Waiver Promises Under Fire

Saamana also trained its guns on the state's earlier farm loan waiver announcement, mocking it as a paper exercise. The editorial claimed that while three lists were allegedly published, ground-level impact has been negligible — going so far as to suggest one could offer a 'Rs 5,000 reward to anyone who can actually find a farmer who received a loan waiver.'

The editorial further alleged that drought relief funds, like development funds before them, risk being distributed on partisan lines — favouring constituencies with ruling-party MLAs while leaving opposition-held areas underserved. These are allegations the MahaYuti government has not yet formally addressed.

Uddhav Camp's Six-Point Demand List

The Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena put forward a six-point relief agenda. It has demanded that the government: declare an official statewide drought immediately, without awaiting procedural delays, in line with a recommendation attributed to veteran leader Sharad Pawar; provide direct assistance of Rs 50,000 per hectare to affected farmers; execute a full blanket waiver of all agricultural loans without conditions; waive tuition fees for children of drought-hit farmers; set up fodder camps (chara chhawani) and ensure drinking water availability; and convene a special session of the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly with an all-party task force to manage drought mitigation.

The editorial additionally criticised the burning of oil to light thousands of lamps for the Prime Minister's birthday celebrations, questioning whether such gestures could lift the shadow of drought from Maharashtra's farmers. The MahaYuti government's formal response to these demands is still awaited, even as the agricultural distress across the state's interior deepens.

Point of View

Visceral image. The MahaYuti's real problem is not the cashews — it is the optics of a ruling class that reached for almonds while farmers reached for nothing. Fadnavis's attempt to outsource blame to 'the administration' is textbook deflection; elected representatives sat at that table and ate. More structurally, the Thackeray camp's demand for a statewide drought declaration echoes a pattern from past Maharashtra crises where delayed official classification delayed relief, compounding agrarian distress. If the government's drought response is ultimately found to track constituency affiliation rather than crop damage data, the political fallout will outlast this news cycle.
NationPress
21 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at the drought review meeting in Nanded?
State Agriculture Minister Dattatray Bharane held an administrative review meeting on Maharashtra's drought situation in Nanded, during which photographs surfaced showing ministers, MLAs, and MPs consuming plates of cashews, almonds, and premium dry fruits. Shiv Sena (UBT)'s Saamana editorial described the spectacle as 'rubbing salt on the open wounds of farmers.'
How did the MahaYuti government respond to the controversy?
Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis acknowledged the feasting was improper and urged officials to remain sensitive, but deflected direct responsibility onto the administration. Shinde faction MP Bandu Jadhav dismissed the criticism, saying it was 'just Rs 500–Rs 1,000 worth of dry fruits.' The Thackeray camp rejected Fadnavis's response, saying elected representatives should have refused the spread themselves.
What are the drought conditions in Maharashtra right now?
According to the Saamana editorial, standing crops including soybean, cotton, bajra, maize, tur, moong, and urad have completely dried up and been ruined across Marathwada, North Maharashtra, and Vidarbha due to scanty rainfall this monsoon season. No formal statewide drought declaration has yet been issued by the government.
What relief measures has Shiv Sena (UBT) demanded?
The Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena has called for an immediate statewide drought declaration, direct financial assistance of Rs 50,000 per hectare to affected farmers, a full blanket farm loan waiver without conditions, waiver of tuition fees for drought-affected farmers' children, establishment of fodder camps and drinking water supply across hit regions, and a special session of the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly with an all-party task force.
What is the criticism about the Maharashtra farm loan waiver?
Saamana's editorial mocked the state's previously announced farm loan waiver, alleging that while three lists were published, farmers on the ground have seen no benefit — offering a satirical 'Rs 5,000 reward to anyone who can find a farmer who actually received a loan waiver.' The editorial also alleged that drought relief funds risk being distributed on partisan lines, favouring ruling-party constituencies over opposition-held areas.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest Yesterday
  2. 1 week ago
  3. 2 weeks ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 2 months ago
  7. 11 months ago
  8. 11 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google