Why is SIT Opposing Bail for Jailed Sabarimala Tantri in Gold Heist Case?

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Why is SIT Opposing Bail for Jailed Sabarimala Tantri in Gold Heist Case?

Synopsis

The Kerala High Court-appointed SIT has strongly opposed bail for Sabarimala temple tantri Kantarar Rajeevar, citing his massive wealth and ties to the gold heist's prime accused. With ongoing investigations revealing serious financial irregularities, Rajeevar's bail plea raises significant concerns about potential obstruction of justice. Key developments unfold as the case progresses.

Key Takeaways

SIT opposes bail for Kantarar Rajeevar.
Allegations of disproportionate wealth accumulation.
Long-standing ties to the prime accused in the heist.
Next hearing set for February 18.
Thirteen arrests made; further investigations ongoing.

Kollam (Kerala), Feb 10 (NationPress) The Special Investigation Team (SIT), appointed by the Kerala High Court, vehemently contested the bail application of the imprisoned Sabarimala temple tantri Kantarar Rajeevar during a session at the Kollam Vigilance Court. The SIT pointed to the substantial accumulation of “massive and disproportionate wealth” and his purported enduring connection with the main suspect in the Sabarimala gold heist case.

The SIT argued that bail should categorically not be granted “under any circumstances”, revealing that the tantri had amassed bank deposits totaling Rs 2.05 crore, while his spouse held deposits nearing Rs 62 lakh.

According to the investigation team, the magnitude of these assets raises significant concerns regarding their origin, thereby necessitating continued custodial scrutiny.

The SIT further contended that Rajeevar falls under the jurisdiction of the Prevention of Corruption Act, given his association with the Sabarimala temple, which operates under the Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB) and, consequently, the Devaswom department of the state government.

On these grounds, the prosecution argued that the charges in question are serious and involve the abuse of a public position.

Emphasizing the overarching conspiracy aspect, the SIT informed the court that the tantri and Unnikrishnan Potti, the principal accused in the Sabarimala gold heist, have known each other since 2004, indicating a longstanding relationship that predates the current allegations.

The investigators asserted that permitting bail at this juncture could obstruct the investigation, including efforts to trace financial trails and identify further beneficiaries.

Following the arguments presented by both parties, the Vigilance Court has reserved its decision regarding the bail application, scheduling the next hearing for February 18.

The inquiry into the alleged gold heist and associated financial discrepancies has so far resulted in the arrest of 13 individuals, four of whom have already obtained bail.

The SIT has indicated that additional arrests may occur as the investigation continues.

In a related update, the Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the bail request of Govardhan, a jeweler from Karnataka and another accused in the case, marking a setback in the efforts of key suspects to gain relief.

Simultaneously, the Kollam Vigilance Court is expected to announce its decisions soon regarding the bail plea of senior CPI-M leader and former TDB President, N. Vasu, whose involvement in the case is currently under scrutiny.

Point of View

It's crucial to maintain an unbiased perspective while covering significant legal matters like the Sabarimala gold heist. The allegations against tantri Kantarar Rajeevar highlight the importance of transparency and accountability in religious institutions, especially when public trust is at stake. Our commitment is to report accurately and fairly, ensuring that the voices of all stakeholders are heard.
NationPress
13 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main allegations against Kantarar Rajeevar?
Kantarar Rajeevar is accused of accumulating disproportionate wealth and having ties to the prime accused in the Sabarimala gold heist case.
What is the role of the SIT in this case?
The SIT is investigating the gold heist and has opposed Rajeevar's bail due to concerns about his financial dealings and potential obstruction of justice.
When is the next hearing for Rajeevar's bail plea?
The Vigilance Court has scheduled the next hearing for Rajeevar's bail plea on February 18.
How many people have been arrested in this case so far?
Thirteen individuals have been arrested in connection with the alleged gold heist, with four securing bail.
What are the broader implications of this case?
This case raises significant questions about corruption and accountability within temple governance and public trust in religious institutions.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 3 months ago
  2. 4 months ago
  3. 6 months ago
  4. 6 months ago
  5. 6 months ago
  6. 6 months ago
  7. 8 months ago
  8. 8 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google