Should Delhi Assembly Speaker Disqualify Atishi as Requested by Sukhbir Badal?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant political move, Sukhbir Badal has called for the disqualification of Atishi from the Delhi Assembly, citing her blasphemous remarks against the Guru Sahiban. This request has stirred reactions among the Sikh community and raised questions about freedom of speech and religious sentiments.
Key Takeaways
- Sukhbir Badal calls for Atishi's disqualification.
- Accusations of blasphemy against the Guru Sahiban.
- Concerns raised about communal harmony in India.
- Legal implications under Indian Penal Code.
- Significance of the Sikh religious authority in this context.
Chandigarh, Jan 17 (NationPress) The President of the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD), Sukhbir Badal, has formally requested the Speaker of the Delhi Assembly, Vijender Gupta, to disqualify the Leader of Opposition, Atishi, from her position in the House due to her alleged blasphemous comments regarding the Guru Sahiban.
In his letter to Gupta, Badal expressed his deep distress over Atishi’s behavior, emphasizing that as both a party leader and a devout Sikh, he found her actions unacceptable. He argued that Atishi’s behavior represented a serious violation of privilege and showed contempt for the House, signifying actions unbecoming of a legislator.
“When a member publicly disrespects the faith, the Guru Sahiban, and the religious feelings of the minority Sikh community, they not only lose their moral authority but also their constitutional right to serve as a lawmaker,” Badal stated. He asserted that Atishi’s comments amounted to religious blasphemy under Sikh doctrines and were deliberately intended to offend the Sikh community’s sentiments.
“Given these circumstances, I urge you to consider filing an FIR against Atishi under Section 295-A of the Indian Penal Code for causing harm to religious feelings, and Section 153-A for inciting hatred and discord among communities,” Badal added, voicing his concern that such provocations pose a significant threat to the precious environment of peace and communal harmony in Punjab and across India.
Stressing that Sikhs globally were looking to him for guidance, Badal informed the Speaker that this issue has raised significant alarm within Panthic institutions, which are led by the highest religious authority of the Sikhs, Akal Takht Sahib. He also conveyed that the Sikh Guru Sahiban symbolizes the eternal spiritual sovereignty of Akal Purakh and the collective commitment of the Khalsa Panth to the eternal truths of cosmic harmony and universal brotherhood, transcending divisions of caste, creed, religion, language, or region.
“The Khalsa Panth draws its divine authority and inspiration from the Guru Granth Sahib, which is the eternal living embodiment of the Guru Sahiban,” he remarked, urging the Speaker to set a precedent for future generations, ensuring that the nation stands as a beacon of respect for all faiths, particularly for minority communities.
Point of View
It's crucial to note that Sukhbir Badal's request to disqualify Atishi raises important issues surrounding political accountability, religious respect, and the limits of free speech. This situation underscores the need for dialogue and understanding in a diverse nation like India, where different communities coexist.
NationPress
19/01/2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted Sukhbir Badal's request to disqualify Atishi?
Sukhbir Badal's request was prompted by Atishi's alleged blasphemous remarks against the Guru Sahiban, which he claims hurt the sentiments of the Sikh community.
What legal actions did Badal suggest against Atishi?
Badal suggested filing an FIR against Atishi under Section 295-A for hurting religious sentiments and Section 153-A for promoting enmity between communities.
What is the significance of the Guru Sahiban in Sikhism?
The Guru Sahiban represents the spiritual sovereignty of Akal Purakh and embodies the principles of cosmic truth and universal brotherhood in Sikhism.
How has this issue affected the Sikh community?
The remarks have evoked serious concern among Panthic institutions and the Sikh community worldwide, emphasizing the need for respect towards their beliefs.
What are the potential implications of this political move?
This political move could set a precedent for how religious sentiments are handled in political discourse, potentially leading to increased tensions between communities.
